Arthur Schopenhauer said, "The truth always passes through three stages: first it is ridiculed; second it is violently opposed; finally it is accepted as being self-evident."
It would appear that most of the answerers here so far have still not made it past the first two stages, alas. They ignore the facts about 9/11, the build-up to it, the real motives behind it, and the scientific and physical impossibility of the official story about 9/11 being true; particularly with regards to the collapse of the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries
But what can one expect, when a recent poll showed that a great number of Americans cannot even remember WHAT YEAR 9/11 TOOK PLACE IN (!!!) Not surprising, in light of such deficiencies in memory, that the multitude of facts which belie the official story is also lost on these people, if they cannot even remember that in happened in September, 2001.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806whatyear.htm
One year before, in September of 2000, a group of neoconservative "thinkers" which have formed Bush's government since then, calling themselves Project for a New American Century (PNAC) published a document making the case for massive increases in defense spending, and for military excursions in the Middle East. Signers of this 'manifesto' included Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Iraq war planner Paul Wolfowitz, and sundry other 'neoconservatives' from the pro-Israel lobby, from defense contracting agencies, and from big oil companies. In this document, called "Rebuilding America's Defenses", they argued that the "process of change" they had in mind would take a long time without some "catastrophic and catalyzing event - a 'New Pearl Harbor'.
Some time before, this same group had signed and sent a letter to Clinton in 1998, urging him to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein
http://zfacts.com/p/780.html.
Who benefitted from 9/11? There were a number of people who directly benefitted: the new owner of the WTC complex at the time, who made billions in insurance claims, the Bush administration, which implemented a series of power-grabbing, anti-American measures limiting human rights and freedoms at home and abroad, and used fear to get people to vote for them again in 2004, and of course defense contractors, who have been raking in hundreds and hundreds of millions in borrowed future taxpayer dollars.
2007-02-03 07:43:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by serge 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I watched it before. It's partially true. The US supported Bin Ladin during the Afghanistan War during the Cold War in order to defeat the Soviets. Now Bin Ladin turned the table or he wanted to take revenge of Bush for doing something that we might not know of. But definitely the US knew about it. Not to mention--it's not only one plane! I mean will Bush care for the death of innocent American civilians? Look how he keeps sending troops to Iraq when there is really no Saddam or weapons of "mass destruction" there.
2007-02-03 06:40:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How much is Karl Rove paying you? If nothing, he owes you; by pushing this well-financed disinformation, you're making those who hate Bush seem like paranoiac whackoes.
Second, you re-inforce the misconception that those who get ahead in this Preppy Republic, whether at Enron or the "intelligence" agencies, are smarter than average. On the contrary, they are Preppy fraternity drunks and no-talent brown-noses who conform like robots. The ruling class wanted puppets and got dummies.
Sorry I'm not showing compassion for the Bushbots--low-IQ boytoys of the rich--by letting them feel that anyone who opposes their Preppy Pipsqueak must be a conspiracy nut.
2007-02-03 07:03:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i believe it was because there is too much evidence that proves the official report of 9/11 false. if you really do your research and look at the evidence, you'll see that there is a lot of questionable information of what "officially" happended on 9/11. if you have time, try to watch a movie titled "loose change". its very interesting and will answer some of your question.
2007-02-03 08:49:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush and Osama grew up playing in the same sand box.. The Bush family and the Ben-Ladens have been in bed together for years, clear back to Grand-daddy Bush
2007-02-03 06:49:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by bodie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
it was planned -- by bin laden and al quaeda. every argument those pinheaded terrorist loving conspiracy nuts has ever come up with has been refuted. looked like controlled demolition? well, yeah, thats what it looks like when a skyscraper falls. what did they expect, for it to topple over like in some old space alien invasion movie? rocket hit the pentagon? um, a plane crashing into a building is kinda likea rocket, isn't it? not enough debris, or too much debris, in PA? speed, angle, and so many other factors account for it all.
2007-02-03 07:22:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I pronounced an identical element and it change into really compelling. i do not imagine our authorities should be in the back of bringing the towers down, yet I do imagine that the terrorists would were planting explosives contained in the towers for years, dressed as elevator restoration adult adult males, or inspite of. i ought to have self belief that first.
2016-11-02 05:36:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it was planned someone would have taken him out by now! Alot of innocent people's lives were lost. It was no game, no plan!
2007-02-03 06:37:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tigerluvr 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes its true, and the world is flat and the loch ness monster exists and aliens live on urans
2007-02-03 06:44:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.. Come on.. R U serious?!? Get a freaking life.
2007-02-03 06:32:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by BigWashSr 7
·
0⤊
1⤋