.
...on human related Global Warming and Bush's failed Iraq policies.
2007-02-03 05:12:01 · 19 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Rush Limbaugh & Sean Hannity are jealous of the scientist triple PHD's, and seem to keep spouting Conservative drivel. It allows them to exercise their mouth mucles, and promote their propaganda and spam.
2007-02-03 06:29:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 2⤋
“Another Ice Age?”
"As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age."
Time Magazine, July 24, 1974.
One basis for those 1974 findings…It was warmer in the 1930s across the globe than in the mid ‘70’s…Honorable mention, it was warmer globally then, than even now!
In 1996 the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a chart showing climatic change over a period of 1000 years. This graph showed a Medieval warming period in which global temperatures were higher than they are today. In 2001 the IPCC issued another 1000 year graph in which the Medieval warming period was missing. So was the spike of the 1930’s!
There are so many more points that will either not be presented, by intentional omission,
so as to sustain the foregone conclusions of Grant driven scientists with Socialist agendas.
Remember the line in the original Ghostbusters movie…I need this college grant job; the private sector expects legitimate results!
2007-02-03 13:30:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What on earth is a "top" scientist? Are scientists who disagree with the latest zeitgeist (the majority of them) not "top" scientists? Or do you have to receive millions of dollars in research grants to shill for global warming in order to qualify as a "top" scientist?
What are Bush's failed Iraq policies? Is it a failure that we have had fewer soldiers die than at the battle for Midway? Is it a failure that we have kept al Quada busy in Iraq and haven't had any terrorist bombings here? Is it a failure that the people there have had free elections?
My point is that there are different ways that people can honestly look at things. Bush's policies are a failure if you look at the enormous expenditure, the loss of life, etc. In other ways they can be viewed as a success. Think for yourself and don't be swayed by Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Al Franken or Arianna Huffington.
2007-02-03 13:46:08 · answer #3 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because Limbaugh & Hannity mix with intelligence like oil mixes with water.
2007-02-03 13:20:09 · answer #4 · answered by Retired From Y!A 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know about Hannity, But I understand that Limbaugh is working with half his brain tied behind his back.
2007-02-03 13:23:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because oil money talks, and they fooled millions into thinking Bush would be good so why not continue their assault on America and the world?
When have those two ever been right? The only time they are right is when they verify their balance at the Bank.
2007-02-03 13:22:59 · answer #6 · answered by Jimbo 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because they're Conservative talk show hosts. What more would you expect from them? They're on the radio with millions of listeners, and therefore they think they have the last say on hot button issues, when they should be dicussing topics you'd hear come up on The View.
2007-02-03 13:19:57 · answer #7 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Follow the money- US only grants $$ for research for pro- not con the theory. No $$ in it to disprove.
2007-02-03 13:31:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The short and correct answer is putting ideology before facts and science
2007-02-03 13:43:35 · answer #9 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All the top scientists are about to publish a finding that says. . .'there is no proof of mankind's involvement in global warming' . This will happen in May . The UN report that you may be referring to is nothing more than a 'political' report.. . and they admitted it !!!!!!!
May, my friend, May !!!
2007-02-03 13:20:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋