If Bush hadn't invaded Iraq, would anyone be worried about Iran now?

Question

Seems like Iran wouldn't be worried about defending itself with a nuclear deterrent if Bush hadn't invaded Iraq.

Answer 1

Well, no-which is why Reagan, Rumsfield & Gates supported Saddam, Iran's enemy. This is an excerpt from the link below "Shaking hands with Saddam" from The National security Archives...

By mid-1982, Iraq was on the defensive against Iranian human-wave attacks. The U.S., having decided that an Iranian victory would not serve its interests, began supporting Iraq: measures already underway to upgrade U.S.-Iraq relations were accelerated, high-level officials exchanged visits, and in February 1982 the State Department removed Iraq from its list of states supporting international terrorism. (It had been included several years earlier because of ties with several Palestinian nationalist groups, not Islamicists sharing the worldview of al-Qaeda. Activism by Iraq's main Shiite Islamicist opposition group, al-Dawa, was a major factor precipitating the war -- stirred by Iran's Islamic revolution, its endeavors included the attempted assassination of Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz.)

Answer 2

The Bush administration used the american public's worry after 9/11 to convince the majority that we ought to continuously bypass to war with Iraq. Now that Iraq has change into an finished failure, all and multiple seems understanding 'whats up, perchance conserving war on each and every united states of america which could pose a probability to us is a nasty idea'. The Bush administration did not attack Iraq because of WMDs, yet because you're addressing Republicans as an finished, that is no longer the challenge. you're making a valid element that it is finished hypocrisy for them to help attacking a a threat probability in Iraq and not in any respect help attacking certain threats in North Korea and Iran. yet a minimum of it truly is an progression. we may be worse off in the adventure that they hadn't discovered from their blunders and were pushing for attacks on North Korea and Iran. So even as it is finished hypocrisy, we ought to continuously be grateful that a minimum of they discovered something from their giant mistake.

Answer 3

Actually Dizz the arb street put on more of a performance in protest of the invasion of afganistan than it did over the invasion of iraq...remember? Ahmaninejad would have been elected anyway. Iraq has no bearing on the conduct of Iran as regards to it's nuclear weapons program.

Answer 4

Yes they would. This Iran problem didn't start yesterday, this has been going on since 1979. Iran is not only involved in Iraq, it's finger prints are all over the support of Fatah in the Palestinian dispute. It is solidly behind Hezbollah in the Lebanon crises, and is the power behind training and supplying Hezbollah in its skirmishes with Israel.

The fact that Iran is attempting to develop nuclear weapons is a suspicion throughout the world, and a reality that should never be allowed to happen.

Although it hasn't been caught with it's hand it the cookie jar in the support of the Taliban, there's a likely possibility of involvement there, too. After all, Iran seems to coexist with al Queda in keeping the insurgents well supplied in Iraq, so why not Afghanistan!

Answer 5

good question! nothing turned out the way Bush said about Iraq so I bet he's lying about Iran now. we're in a huge mess and it's getting worse. Bush should at least try to work things out with Iran and not try to start another war while we're losing in Iraq and may lose in Afghanistan too. but that's assuming Bush knows right from wrong!

Answer 6

I've been worried about Iran ever since Reagan and Bush I used Ollie North to sell them weapons, some of which are now in use to kill U.S. Servicemen and women.

Keep in mind that the bush-league is trying to set up the same sort of feeling that they did agains Iraq.

Operable nukes = WMD ???

Answer 7

It would appear that you don't know anything about history at all but that aside, the answer is YES there would be worried. Iran and many others have been a concern for every administration for decades. If you look at the rhetoric, hate speech and what is taught to their children in schools about the rest of the world...you would be a fool to not be concerned! The difference would only be how politicians would deal with it.

Answer 8

Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons, and according to the CIA, they don't have a nuclear weapons program either.

BushCo and Israel are lying just like they lied about Iraq's WMDs.

Answer 9

Actually yes we would. The issue is not defending themselves but the spread of the radical Islamic beliefs they carry in that country. Their president has stated repeatedly in public that he plans to wipe Israel from the map and all non-Islamic countries. And this is every time he speaks publicly. The U.S. being one of the main targets he claims to be first in line. That is clearly because the U.S. is the biggest threat to him not succeeding in his objectives. If you take any time to watch the world news you will see the statements he is making and understand the threat to not only the U.S. but the rest of all non-believers in their version of Islam. The sad thing is the majority of people who believe in Islam do not feel the way most people in Iran and their government do. But they are not standing up against them to fix the radical problems that exist within their religion. The U.S. just like in Iraq is sort of being forced by the world community to do the dirty work so-to-speak. And then to cleanse their guilt feelings for making the U.S. the sacrificial dog they then speak out against us to cleanse their selves of that guilt.

And finally if Iran was so worried about the U.S. attacking why are they sending government soldiers to Iraq in secret to pose as terrorists and insurgents. As of late many have been caught. That seems to be an act of war towards the U.S., does it not?

Answer 10

They have said they want to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth. Even if George Bush wouldn't have invaded Iraq. Nuclear weapons were still in there plans