Seriously? Isn't it crazy that we're actually having this debate? South Africa recently passed a county wide recognition of gay marriages. This is South Africa for crying out loud. Apartheid only ended in that country like 10 years ago.
2007-02-03 03:24:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Yes I think it is a sham. I believe that our elected officials are being lobbied by the right wing so hard that they fear for their respective public lives.
Places like Arkansas are so engrained in litteral religious beliefs they cannot see what they are doing. All I can say is SHAME ON THEM.
The rights afforded heterosexuals should be the same for bisexual, lesbians and gays. Quit hiding behind the bible.
2007-02-03 03:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by Ole Charlie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, of course. South Africa, a third world country is far and wide beyond the United States.
2007-02-03 03:35:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i are not getting the equivalent medical care under the regulation element? What regulations are distinctive for a gay guy than for me? The regulation is the comparable for each guy or woman and so is this equivalent rights element I pay attention for all time. interior the state I stay in, it may be unlawful for 2 immediately adult adult males or 2 immediately women individuals to marry one yet another to boot. i think you will possibly desire to assert it rather is equivalent medical look after all. it won't be equivalent rights that some say they choose that's definitely new rights that at the instant no person regrdless of race, intercourse, colour, creed, faith, or sexual decision has. there's a super distinction between the two. I additionally dislike the comparrison of this concern to what black human beings went by not previously. I definitely have in no way observed an illustration on a cafe that asserts "immediately in basic terms" or one on a restroom that asserts "NO GAYS ALLOWED". in my opinion i might desire to care much less approximately this concern or what human beings do with their private lives. i might desire to in no way think of waking up each morning with a super bushy leg rubbing up against me yet to each their very own i think. i be attentive to you are able to in no way restoration all the unfairness we as persons have....and all of us have them however the main's in this united states of america hassle-free civil rights and regulations are the comparable for all. What you're speaking approximately changing is going lots better than faith. i think of our society and lifestyle often nonetheless perspectives marriage as a union between a guy and a female and which would be confusing to alter no remember what number new rights and regulations are conceived.
2016-09-28 09:01:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they should, and I think it's especially fitting that you mention Apartheid considering that Desmond Tutu himself has recently compared the treatment of homosexuals to Apartheid.
"The prominent South African says homophobia is a "crime against humanity" and "every bit unjust" as apartheid."
BTW, pay no attention to Jon-e-Sunami, he was just another troll that used to regularly appear on the Yahoo message boards that couldn't keep an ID for more than 3 days. If RAMO was meant for anyone, it is him.
2007-02-03 04:38:54 · answer #4 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Posting from the united states: YES! there are only 3 areas where in my opinion we are not equil. They are: marriage and military service. And some teaching jobs
2007-02-03 05:12:49 · answer #5 · answered by robert2020 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!
2007-02-03 04:54:35 · answer #6 · answered by SB 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They already have it. When have you ever heard of a court inquiring whether or not a defendant were a homosexual?
The problem is, some homosexuals want special rights. They already have the right to marry. But they want the right to "marry" some one of their own sex. That would make a travesty of marriage.
Homosexuals have all the rights that everyone else has. Marriage is between a man and a woman. That is the definition of marriage. Homosexuals want to change the definition of marriage, so that they can fantasize about the legality of their activities. So now you know.
2007-02-03 03:42:26 · answer #7 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
All the people like us are we, And everyone else is They.
Author: Rudyard Kipling
2007-02-03 04:05:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes!
2007-02-03 03:34:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course homosexuals should receive equal rights.
2007-02-03 03:32:06 · answer #10 · answered by Kedar 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋