English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm doing a speech on the conspiracy- theories... Let me know what you think!

2007-02-03 03:01:48 · 20 answers · asked by lilangel 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Isn't it kind of strange that:
- the government didn't react to the many, usually very specific warnings that it was given beforehand?
- three planes were able to reach their target while it is standard procedure that suspicious airplanes are intercepted by jets within ten minutes?
- a 38 meter wide Boeing 757 made a 5,5 meter hole in the pentagon?

2007-02-03 03:14:06 · update #1

20 answers

It appears the U.S. has fallen into a condition that had the founding fathers concerned from the start. The original goal of "government for the people by the people" is in jeopardy. The industrialist have now taken near full control of the government and its agencies including the military. The goal now is something that has been termed, the New World Order: It involves globalization, extreme capitalism, and control of the people through terrorism.

9/11 was a terrorist attack alright, but not by whom we are told. WTC building #7 imploded (not collapsed), after suffering only minor damage: To make things even more suspicious, the incident went underreported. After doing some research, both on the WTC buildings as well as the Pentagon, there is little doubt, in my mind, that the official story is part of "The Big Lie".

________________________________________

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

2007-02-04 02:07:43 · answer #1 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 1 1

There's a reason these conspiracy theories exist.

Not to mention the fact that Bush family members were running security for the airport, for the airlines, and for the towers, and the fact that the Bushes and the bin Ladens made suspicious investments which stood to make a lot of money from 9/11, the Bush administration downplayed the role of Saudi Arabia, where the funding for the attack and the hijackers came from, and immediately attacked Afghanistan for harboring terrorists. The entire section on Saudi Arabia in the report was classified.

And most importantly, there are unanswered questions because Bush blocked any attempts to launch an investigation.

I'm not saying I believe or disbelieve anything, but I will say that this is the reason there are so many different, sometimes crazy-sounding theories... because they acted like they were hiding something and refused to give answers the American people deserve.

2007-02-03 03:10:25 · answer #2 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 3 2

It is pretty obvious that the US government was conducting tactical excersices on the morning on 9/11 and this at least partially explains the slow response.

These operations were classified, until recently, so at least that part we know was a piece that they refused to share with us. There is probably more that you will never know without a security clearance.

2007-02-03 03:39:46 · answer #3 · answered by barringtonbreathesagain 2 · 0 0

Of course there is more going on here than meets the eye. Not only did our government allow the events of 911 to happen. They more likely than not played a major role in planning it all. They needed to shore up their intent to go into the middle east. They knew that Saddam Hussein was no threat to these United States. So; Just like Pearl Harbor. They had to stage an event to secure passage to a war in Iraq. So that they could later move into Iran and Syria. Anyone who believes that a man in a cave in Afganistan orchestrated the events of 911 needs to buy some ocean front property that I have for sale in Kansas...

2007-02-03 03:31:31 · answer #4 · answered by outlaw 2 · 2 2

Suspicious planes weren't intercepted in 10 minutes before 9-11 and I doubt they can even manage that now. If you watch documentaries or, heaven forbid, READ something about it you will find out that there were no fighter aircraft patrolling the skies over the east coast at the time.

So there goes that theory.

2007-02-03 03:24:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

no longer merely do i imagine conspiracy theories about 9/11 are insensitive, i imagine they're downright insulting. they're an insult to absolutely everyone who change into alive and former adequate to understand what change into occurring on that day, now to not coach the households of those who were killed. I undergo in ideas precisely the position i change into even as it occurred, it change into authentic, it change into terrorism. I actually were to floor 0. there is really no reason the U.S. authorities ought to attack the WTC now to not coach the Pentagon, if flight ninety 3 had reached its purpose of the White living house/Capitol, i do not imagine human beings ought to nevertheless have self belief it change right into a authorities conspiracy! ought to the U. S. authorities really purpose their very personal human beings and those places? If the president himself were killed contained in the White living house, ought to you nevertheless have self belief Bush change into in the back of this? authentic human beings were lost on that day, it change into as authentic because it receives, and the united states authorities ought to no longer and would not kill its personal human beings like that, it truly is a perversion of each and every thing the country stands for. yet because you've of direction offered into a number of that conspiracy BS, it truly is a few components that refute your ridiculous conspiracy theories:

2016-11-02 05:17:10 · answer #6 · answered by mosesjr 4 · 0 0

Just what "standard procedure" about intercepting aircraft "within ten minutes" are you referring to, skippy? (You also may want to read the 9/11 Commission's Report on this; it correctly explains what happened with the interceptor aircraft from Langley AFB, Va that day.)

And judging from the pictures I've seen of the Pentagon, the hole was one heck of a lot bigger than 5.5 meters.....

2007-02-03 03:25:52 · answer #7 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 1 2

Yes and if you notice someone , probably the conservatives acutally moved the twin towers to a JFK runway at the airport.
Then in the midst of all of the commotion the buildings were moved back to their original location then fell.

2007-02-03 03:18:42 · answer #8 · answered by caciansf 4 · 2 2

Watch "911: In Plane Site" and decide for yourself.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3803479213130455881

2007-02-03 03:11:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes Ma'm. I don't think, we'll ever know how many Terriorists, were actually behind, crashing into Buildings. And killing over 3,00 Innocent Amercans. That's how you should start Your Report. Get as much Facts as you can. It's frightening!

2007-02-03 03:06:46 · answer #10 · answered by Goggles 7 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers