He said Global warming was a serious challenge and we need to develop technologies that reduce or produce no emissions.
Is President Bush a tree hugger?
2007-02-03 02:31:34 · 8 answers · asked by Mrs. Bass 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no way hes a tree-hugger!! hes just trying to score points...
he just cares about his oil profits.
2007-02-03 02:37:14 · answer #1 · answered by brock 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
NO he's not a tree hugger...Global Warming is a huge problem with alot of american citizens and most of those groups are green nazis that like to flex their musles...there for the president has to address this issue to make them happy and make him self look good to that group of people. Everybody has issue with something and if a large amout of people have issue with the same problem is will be addressed at some point or another,
2007-02-03 02:38:26 · answer #2 · answered by Spades Of Columbia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dire changes in Climate predicted. Nothing can be done to stop them. According to a report done by the intergovernmental Panel on Climate change, released in Paris. Scientist say we can slow the effect but not stop it. By making massive cuts in the emissions amount of Carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas released that traps heat in the atmosphere. Bush and Rush have been telling Americans for years now this is a fabricated lie by "the evil tree hugger bunch". Rush even tried to tell America he knows more about Climate change then theses scientists who study it. Bush failed to sign the World agreement to halt Greenhouse gas emissions. The Kyoto accord.
Now Bush released a statement saying "the report confirms Bush's views on climate change". Election year stunts. pure partisan politics. The same partisan politics that they accuse Hillary of. The truth is. Republicans will do anything in their power to protect the people they represent, the Corporations. Republicans don't care about long term harm just short term profit. Exxon Mobil had revenue of $370.68 billion in 2005 and reported $377.64 billion in 2006. Exxon profit was $36.13 billion or $4.5 million per hour in 2005. In 2006 profit was $39.5 billion.
2007-02-03 02:51:36 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Doesn't matter if our dependence upon oil has caused global warming or not, or whether George W. believes in global warming or not. I like the idea of no longer giving money to terrorist states and being energy independent.
2007-02-03 02:41:00 · answer #4 · answered by mamasquirrel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You logic is incorrect. of direction the climate has replaced simply by fact the earth has shaped. no person disputes that fact. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, simply by fact it has replaced in the previous in no potential that guy won't be able to alter it. it relatively is like saying that on account that there have been wooded area fires in the previous guy existed, guy won't be able to reason wooded area fires. Sorry to burst your politically inspired bubble with easy logic. Edit to Barry Jones. out of your article: "in basic terms what motives the onset of considerable and minor ice a while keeps to be a secret. "Our understanding of the mechanisms of climatic replace is a minimum of as fragmentary as our information," concedes the national Academy of Sciences record. "no longer in basic terms are the issue-unfastened scientific questions quite often unanswered, yet in many situations we don't yet be attentive to sufficient to pose the biggest questions." it relatively is an authoritative tone?
2016-10-01 08:54:39 · answer #5 · answered by eylicio 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he did not say global warming is man made.
2007-02-03 02:38:52 · answer #6 · answered by 007 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. He just wants to get the enviromentalist off his back. I guess he thinks it's easier just to go with it than to fight back on issues like this.
2007-02-03 02:36:59 · answer #7 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
as i said yesterday, he never said global warming is caused by man
he just said we basically need to end foreign dependence on oil, and try to develop less pollution
everyone knows cars pollute, but causing global warming... i don't think so
2007-02-03 02:36:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋