would that have an influence of what would go on in iraq
2007-02-03 02:06:04 · 10 answers · asked by ry s 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
no,but it sure would lower my taxes.
2007-02-03 02:10:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
nope, the goverment would never allow it and remember both dem and repub support the war or there wouldnt have been soldier sent becuase dems in congress can over through bushes actions and for all we know bush could have wanted to take out those soldier but congress said hey lets add more , dems get just as much say in what the president does as he, maybe even more. and think about it bush got relected if parents didnt want to support the war they would have gone w/the dem. so over half of our population wouldnt walts out and this all goes back to the spilt during the civil war, besides are you an idiot for suggesting this i mean these kids need to go to school make somthing of there lives instead of worrying about iraq which isnt a war because were not blowing each other up were just finishing what needed to be done-giving them a new life why should we be selfish and not send us, who get killed alittle while inocent people die there every day all the time-why should we say sorry it was your fault for being born there-like they had a choice,
2007-02-03 02:19:01 · answer #2 · answered by Britanie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
relatively everyone knew it was unlawful whilst Blair twisted it and Conservatives supported the conflict on the 2nd. This was the view of Lib-Dems for in any respect cases. Lord Goldsmith admitted it became into now no longer approved on the 2nd in spite of the incontrovertible fact that he became into silenced Few suitable politicians like Robin prepare dinner, Clair short and Galloway attempt to protest in spite of the incontrovertible fact that each and each man or woman, British fools listened to Blair. yet actuality could succeed.
2016-10-01 08:53:58 · answer #3 · answered by eylicio 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Refusing to go to school is against the law. Children must be in school until they are 16 at least. Teachers refusing to teach would violate their contracts. And it would be just one more ridiculous decision that would show the world a divided America. We've got enough troubles; we don't need that! Everything we do that shows us to be a divided nation weakens us and makes us more vulnerable to terrorist attacks.
2007-02-03 02:16:22 · answer #4 · answered by missingora 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, what differences would that actually make? First, of all it's not possible. It would be impossible to get everyone to agree to that. You have to admit it doesn' t sound too bright. How would the teachers pay their bills? What about the children and their education? Who would we really be hurting? EDUCATION IS POWER!!
2007-02-03 02:18:22 · answer #5 · answered by Blu 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope.. you'd get suspended and then sent to an alternative school. Refuse to go and you will eventually wind up with a low paying job or in jail.
2007-02-03 02:14:12 · answer #6 · answered by Bobbie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure, it would ensure a huge pool of uneducated cannon fodder available for the next war.
2007-02-03 02:13:39 · answer #7 · answered by Dane 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes...that would work...then the kids and teachers would get dumber...and the soldiers we send to iraq would get dumber...and we'd lose the war...and we'd be ruled over in a few years by radical muslim Immams...lol
2007-02-03 02:12:26 · answer #8 · answered by Piguy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not one bit, we'd just have a bunch of dumbasses with no education and a bunch of laid of teachers running around...
2007-02-03 02:08:57 · answer #9 · answered by Wsdm 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why don't you try it ?
2007-02-03 02:10:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋