I have a 516 mb micro mini sd. It won't hold more then 50 songs. What am I doing wrong ? should it hold more ?

Question

I got the micro mini so I could play songs on my cell phone ( A motorola E815). I thought the 516 MB would hold around 500 songs but after around 50 songs the card is full. Am I doing something wrong ? I am using mp3's because it wouldn't play WMA's.

Answer 1

Depending on the quality of the mp3 file (sound quality) the file size varies. A low quality song can be as small as 800 KB. But most songs that people keep are between 128kb per sec(kbps) to 192 kbps.. So on an average the file size is around 4-5 MB.
So you would be able to put a max of around 100 files like that. Check your file sized on the card.. You must be having real big files of up to 10 MB. That's posisble if you got many long songs ..
And you might also be having other files on it. Select all your mp3 files and right click and check properties to see the total file size of all the songs together.

Answer 2

With a 512MB memory you should be able to hold approx. 120 MP3s or 240 WMAs

Answer 3

i think of the national risk-free practices motive is a stable one for Benghazi, and a foul one for the AP and IRS scandals. there is not any tale with Benghazi, and proving that there is not any longer something to it would in all probability harm embassy risk-free practices (which hasn't been all that stable in the years previous Obama the two). i think of the IRS scandal turns into no longer something a lot as nicely, however the persons have the the superb option to be attentive to what befell and it is going to likely be explored extra--and if the well-known public's concept of the story the click is putting out is near to the mark, then there are severe issues to repair. (If actuality would not adventure the present version, i will think of of abuses of potential via the republicans, yet as you factor out, it would not do a lot of stable to indicate out all the cases your combatants dismiss the form and American concepts whilst your area is going to do the comparable ingredient.) The AP scandal is the superb out those. Like Bush might have whilst he became into referred to as out via the libs on Gitmo and Valerie Plame, it relatively is an risk for Obama to take cost and take duty. If he leads the government nicely and contraptions up stable anti-snooping/privateness risk-free practices rules (for each man or woman, no longer in basic terms the government) and brings the government consistent with that as superb he can, then he can squash that scandal via turning it into an risk. If he leads in the different direction and makes a decision to enable relatively everyone use any suggestion they might get their hands on against absolutely everyone, he is going to severely harm the Democrats and help the noticeably anti-government nutcases benefit help. i think of ways he handles that one scandal will define his administration--the different 'scandals', Obamacare, Bin weighted down--none of which will matter--all which will matter is regardless of if individuals nonetheless think of they're residing in between the main unfastened international locations in the international--and how he handles that's the attempt. we would desire to be sure--is wikileaks the way forward for information, is suppression the way forward for information, or are we going to purpose to discover a nicely-balanced midsection floor (between unfastened/cheating and controlled/accountable, no longer left and the superb option) lower back?