Unfortunitly the term Team is more pertinant then the parties. We grow up wanting to be picked for the winning team. So as adults if we veiw politics as a team then who would want to be a part of the underdog team. We need to take the term team out of politics and start focusing on whats best for the country as a whole.
2007-02-03 00:57:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Recognize Team Red but follow Team Blue.
2007-02-03 09:12:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kwan Kong 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not a good solution in the US as we now have it. Both teams now are destroying the country with excess spending and we could facing a catastrophic depression as the economy slows per the Fed Chairman:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/bernanke-urges-congress-promptly-tackle/story.aspx?guid=%7B04B74938%2D845C%2D4C30%2D8621%2D75868101149E%7D
2007-02-03 09:04:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lighthearted 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No,it is very harm to us if the parties will come for a settle ment between them.The people will be made fools if such things mentioned in above happen
2007-02-03 08:55:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by sripan83 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, it is required ..as u know..condition of south india, there r no. of small regional parties , which diversified voters mind from main issues of india, at the time of election , and after election they take money to help major party to form government, so this system is also encourage corruption at highest level of india..i agree , there should be only 2 parties.
2007-02-06 04:29:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We only have two or three major parties - others are just puppets or insignificant players in the field wasting their time in pursuit of an unreachable goal post!
2007-02-03 09:47:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sami V 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
YES c and d or not important!
2007-02-03 08:52:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hunter 4
·
0⤊
1⤋