i am really desperate to know more about philosophy
2007-02-02 23:53:01 · 2 answers · asked by owen4chinyere 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
he felt that philosophy was an attempt to relieve confusion,,,,,, the confusion being caused by us asking questions such as "do we have a spirit, is there a God",,, so the language we use to form our questions leads us to this confusion,,,,,,,, since each question would require a different approach to answering it,,,, there is no one method of philosophy,,, but many,,,,, hence philosophy is now not what"
2007-02-03 03:07:15 · answer #1 · answered by dlin333 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do people shop asking this question? Are you all interior the comparable classification? besides... Wittgenstein is maximum possibly concerning the bounds of understanding, besides the bounds of philosophy. on the top of the Tractatus he says (paraphrasing) 'of that which we can not communicate, thereof we would desire to be silent' i've got continually thought this particularly a Kantian factor, in that this is highlighting the bounds of human understanding. besides the undeniable fact that, at that factor Wittgenstein hadn't study plenty different than for the works of Frege and Russell Philosophy is i be attentive to no longer what by using fact as a challenge this is inquisitive with regard to the bounds of human understanding and tries to push previous them. In doing so it loses any concrete family members and as a effect turns into impossible to describe. think of of it in those words - physics is the medical study of the actual international, philosophy is i be attentive to no longer what.... get it?
2016-12-16 20:09:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋