I would not have started this war. I would not!
Good to know!
Most excellent adventure, Hillary Dude!
And the fact that you voted to authorize President Bush to start the war? No problem!
You can fix that during your next travel back in time.
In March 2003 she was still in favor of the war, telling the Code Pink anti-war feminists that she disagrees with them. Even saying that she's been carefully studying Saddam Hussein and the threat he poses for over ten years (so much for her crap now in 2007 that Bush misled her).
I need to say this again Such a LIAR
Apparently this evil woman thinks she better now appease the Cindy Sheehans in order to prevail.
http://newsbusters.org/node/10585#comment
2007-02-02 22:50:07 · 14 answers · asked by Feelsgood 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Just like her husband, she will say anything to anyone to convey any image that she needs that day. And the mainstream media will not question her on it.
2007-02-02 22:59:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
She was believed the lies told to her by President Bush, Colin Powell, Condi Rice etc. The were lies originated with her trust of the untrustworthy administration after 9/11. The intelliegence was wrong and the intelligence community knew it. They lied to Bush et al. He was eager to believe anything that he thought would destroy El Queda (spelling seems to vary) He was misled; he failed to question the information; the lies spread. Many people believe Iraq was a threat. Much blame lies with Saddam in kicking out the UN inspectors. That's an extremely suspicious act for a nation that has nothing to hide. I know you intend this post as a political slam of Senator Clinton. No one wants to take the time and analyze the real events. When President Bush trusted the lies and sent Colin Powell to the United Nations for help, the Democrats united with the Republicans to back him. They were all wrong, but honestly so. Now, you act as though only the Democrats are back-tracking on their first Iraqi position and you know that's not true. Even Senator John Warner has abandoned the president. People make mistakes and honest people admit they made a mistake. The President has admitted he made a bad judgment and is now trying to make the best of it. Yet you only attack one Senator who has changed her mind as new information came to light. The source you cite in your link is not an unbiased site. Try to read all the facts. If you want to hate Senator Clinton, try to do so on a reasoned basis. If you want an unbiased views of the news from both the left and the right, Try RealClearPolitics. Don't be a parrot. Become informed and think for yourself.
2007-02-02 23:27:05 · answer #2 · answered by David M 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
stable sufficient, so which you are the only. i used to be thinking approximately that. i replaced into as quickly as pronounced that somebody believes what Fox says, besides the undeniable fact that i did no longer understand who that was. So now i be attentive to, that is you. you desire to be the only one. I evaluate for you. think ofyou've have been given to appreciate regardless of: lots of folk on earth somewhat hate the individuals. And a stable bigger variety purely intensely dislike them. some with marvelous motives, some with very stupid motives and a few for no purpose in any understand. an further section you'll be able to desire to nicely known is that numerous those persons stay in international locations the situation no longer something gets released without their govt approval. women and adult adult males in those international places somewhat for sure anticipate that if the U.S. govt facilitates such piece of rubbish to be revealed, the federal government has the comparable opinion with it. you're taking those 2 concerns together and upload some moron interior the US who thinks this is a grand suggestion to piss anybody off, just to look what could happen, and the brown stuff starts off hitting the comprehensive followers on earth. If it was now no longer this ignorant abusive action picture, it may somewhat achieveable be some ingredient else that instruments the hearth off. there is purely way too plenty pork with the US that any excuse can set it off.
2016-12-16 20:08:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know what really is scary ? She's probably going to win, then hook up with "Stretch" Pelosi, (you know how the clintons love California, all of Hollywood has slept at the white house) open the borders, attempt to socialize everything, probably do it, the money gates will flow out to all the "Illegals", and it will be the end of the U.S. as we know it. What an easy way for a communist government to take over the united states, they can't do it by force, so they just will bleed us to death, then grab it, and the liberals are more than happy to help them.
2007-02-02 22:59:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
She should not be held for her husbands lie either..... However when Clinton lied, nobody died. When Bush lied We lost alot and still counting............ Who cares who Clinton screwed. Thats between husband and wife, not up to us. Like he is the only President to get some one the side...... He just got caught. Get over it
2007-02-02 23:56:55 · answer #5 · answered by tammer 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sounds like she has been taking campaigning lessons from the original Waffle House proprietor, John Forbes Kerry!
2007-02-02 23:25:35 · answer #6 · answered by taxidriver 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Another Kerry kool-aid drinker,I was for the war B4 I was against it~They are all the same. That's why the resolution they just done isn't binding. They are afraid we are gonna win the war so they want the option of being for it before they were against it!
2007-02-03 00:19:37 · answer #7 · answered by Classic96 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She now says she will stop the war if elected, Guess she doesn't understand we were attacked first and both sides must stop fighting for there to be an end of a war. The war will go on wither she is elected are not as our enemy still feels we must die
2007-02-02 23:09:33 · answer #8 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Looks like she's learning a thing or two from the best, Bush.
2007-02-02 23:35:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know Chrissy, but don't let Jack, Janet or Mr. Roper find out.
2007-02-02 23:01:21 · answer #10 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋