Who is responsible for divide pakistan from india.(a).Mahatma Gandhi (b).Momd. Jinna (c).British (d)Situation?

Question

Please describe your religion,contry and reason for your answer..
you can also mail your answer for get my reply :[e-mail]

Answer 1

Situation

Govindaraj, Hindu, India, Reason: Fact

Answer 2

All of them.
1. Gandhiji - He kept on telling that Hindu-Muslim Ek Hei...and it had created an adverse affact that we are not one. (The fact is we are Indians)
2. British - They wanted to give us independence, but wanted to leave us with the burning issue, which will going to last forever
3. Mohn. Jinna - He was a good person, did not belive in Koran and did not go to mosque - If the person doesnt believe in the God, how can he fight on behalf of 1 prticular community? The fact is he wanted the prime leadership and Nehru also. So, cannot keep 2 prime ministers..and created pakistan for him
4. Situation - It was favorable situation, had Nehru admitted to quit of the PM race and promoted Jinha

Answer 3

Mahatma Gandhi & Momd. Jinna

Answer 4

Mahatma Gandhi,who not only ignored the public opinion,but exhibited hurry for the premiership of Nehru, that too against the wishes of his own partymen. The opinion of the partymen was also gathered thru' a secret polling,from state congress committees,in which none had voted for Nehru but for Patel, Rajgopalachari and Kriplani.
Had he not been in hurry for the independence,so as to make Nehru as PM, or even at the worst,had he accepted Jinnah as PM, the partition could have been avoided.

Answer 5

and think both the britishers and situation were equally responsible for the division. i'm punjabi. i live in india only and the reson behind my statement is that britshers didn't wanted to go from india very peacefully. so, they were knowing about bitter queries between hindus and muslims so they moved to britain but planned to mess all the ppl of india to fight with each other before leaving and thatswhy they told the indian community that we were not able to divide jammu n kashmir and u have to decide it on ur own and they ran. then muslims and hindus kept on argueing on this region so thats how india broke up into 2 poices-INDIA AND PAKISTAN, if u think my answer is right, then plz do choose it as the best answer 'cause i never got that in my whole life!!

Answer 6

i am frm india , every one is some what responsible for the partition of the sub cintinent but u only placed four why dont u place entire congress party and muslim league, all the members of the parties are responsible , british off course added only fuel but in indian history it had vast defferences during the times of rajas and sultans now how can we ignore many things but i think the position in which now both nations are placed in rivalarily needs to be answered most importantly than the causes , its just ignoring indira rajiv and all other politions towards the position of india in the world still a developing nation

Answer 7

From the little bit I know about the history of that region, the british instigated the divide and rule policies. This led to conflicts between Muslims and Hindus. The conflict in turn led to the Muslims demanding a separate state. So I'd say it was a chain of events that caused it and not one entity.

Answer 8

OK Nilesh, I'm Australian, raised in the Anglican Church. I was born after the separation. I would say (d) Situation. I know two high caste Hindu ladies and they have nothing good to say about Muslims, even though they have both been Australian citizens for 16 or more years. Both of them are less than 45 years old and otherwise are very nice people.

Answer 9

I am Indian, non religious but unfortunately it is imposed on me. So i am a "Hindu+Muslim+Christian" if you like it. Forget about this analysis where you have a British to blame. I will ask you one question and answer it honestly.

1. Will you rent your property or live as neighbor with a Kashmiri Muslim family?.

2. Will you plan your vaction to Kashmir?

3. Will your company recruit a Kashmiri Muslim?.

There is no British to blame the situation. I leave the rest to you.

Answer 10

The history of Hindu Muslim political disparity was actually originated from The Independence War of 1857. The 1857’s uprising was a joint effort of both Hindus and Muslims against English rule. But After the failure of the uprising and fall of Delhi, Hindu political leaders and the Hindu press, in trying to evade British revenge took charge against the Muslims and set the responsibility of so-called mutiny on Muslims. This way they safe guarded their benefits and Muslims in turn faced the horrific consequences of their participation in the uprising.
In 1867, nationalists were divided for the first time into Hindu and Muslim camps when Hindu religious zealots termed “Urdu”, the official language of India as the language of Muslims and started processions and protests to change Urdu to Dev Nagri Hindi. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, the most notable Muslim intellectual and biggest supporter of Hindu-Muslim unity who, few years ago gave the famous line. ”Hindus and Muslims are Two Beautiful Eyes of a Beautiful Bride”. When saw the Hindu Nationalists are turning away their faces, first time in history stated that Muslims of India are a distinctive nation.
Final blow to Hindu-Muslim unity was annulment of partition of Bengal (1911). Bengal was a province with vast area and massive population. For administrative reasons British parted it into two provinces. Muslims became majority in East Bengal. Infuriated, Hindu conservatives and Indian National Congress started civil disobedience movement to force British rule to concede their decision. The annulment of partition of Bengal proved, once again that Hindu majority would not do any thing to protect the basic interests of Muslims and detachment from nationalist agenda was crucial for their survival.
From then on, every political development was shadowed by distrust among the diverse faiths of sub-continent. Indian National Congress, quasi-nationalists and the representatives of majority did little to curb its racism towards minorities. Without getting into the emotional rhetoric about the human rights violations against Muslims, 1937’s Congress’ provincial majority was the last nail in the coffin of united India. So in 1940, Lahore resolution was passed and promulgated by All India Muslim League, which fixed a path for the Muslim nation that was the path, which led to a sovereign state for the Muslim nation.