English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I posted some questions 5 hours ago, Asking Where Can I get a big sign that says "9/11 Was an Inside Job" Because I wanted to spread the truth at ground zero.

To my shock 1/2 Of you answered, If i saw you there, I would punch you. Beat you to death, Kill you, Or you just hoped that happened to me. While you contiued to follow BUSH Co. for carrying out 9/11.


Well are you happy somebody who went to ground zero every day with a sign like that is now dead? He was there trying to get justice for his father who was MURDERED ON 9/11.

After him being upset about his dead dad and fighting for him, u would want to kill him for doing that.

Well now hes dead, Are you people happy?

Hes the guy on the left:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/5861

You people who replied to me like that, are horrible people.

2007-02-02 20:49:37 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

I wish death on no one for what they speak. But the garbage you speak is enough at times to make me wonder about the benefits of free speech!. I am starting to think that you should be at least able to think for yourself before you speak in public. EVERY web site that promotes 911 being an inside job has been debunked by science, eyewitnesses, and photographs. EVERY one. Are you a Michael Moore wanna be?

2007-02-02 21:00:32 · answer #1 · answered by mark g 6 · 2 3

All activists face opposition and have people trying to discredit them. You must not believe in your cause very much if you let a couple of naysayers goad you into withdrawing from the movement.

And just for the record - just because people don't believe that the US government was responsible for 9/11, it doesn't also mean that they're happy such a bright young man is dead (or anyone else for that matter). You're going to need much tougher skin if you plan on convincing anyone of anything.

I wish you the best - good luck with your cause.

2007-02-02 21:13:04 · answer #2 · answered by They call me ... Trixie. 7 · 1 2

I never said anything diragatory. All I said on that post was it's been done already. I never threaten people just as you have. You can't take everyone out of context all the time.

There isn't anyone who will accept the truth of that day, whether it was an inside job or not. I saw the videos of everything as well. And watched portions of them on infowars.com. I know what people are trying to say, but just because Bush's brother was head of the security company, it doesn't mean the government had anything to do with it.

The weekend before 9/11, they were told to bring down the power so 'new cable' could be installed. Thing is, it wasn't Bush's brother's company that put the new cable in. That could have been anyone, including the leaseholder who purposely took out insurance for acts of terrorism when he'd taken possession of the building. They have the paper trail for that. He had paid $15 million dollars for the twin towers, plus the other buildings. The city of New York had complained that it was getting too expensive to run them and keep up with things that had to be 'redone' so to speak and it was costing the city too much money. The leaseholder got over $900 million dollars for that complex. That had nothing to do with Bush. That was between Gulianni and the leaseholder.

While watching the slow motion of the towers coming down, it would have been impossible for the burning fuel of the planes to heat up enough to collapse the buildings. Also, as they stated, I could see the additional tuffts of smoke coming out from the floors which were still safe and away from any fire. They had a close-up, if you saw it, and the new investigators said that they used Thermate. It heats up and desolves so fast, it literally melt whatever it comes into contact with. I watched the thermate melt the corners of the building out just before it collapsed. They also had the tapes of people saying there were many...much more than several explosions and it wasn't the jet. That fire was reduced and there was nothing in that building to burn that way.

It is scientifically impossilble to justify that amount of heat from one single plane. There have been fires that have burned for days, some up to 7 days, and the steel didn't melt. A normal fire such as that is just not hot enough. But Thermate is and is used specifically for controlled demolition. Plane fuel was no where near that area and even if it was, plane fuel cannot melt concrete and this stuff just pulverized it.

The leaseholder also admitted they pulled the other building that was not hit by a plane. They demolished it the exact same way. Buildings like that do NOT crumble into themselves leaving nothing. Gulianni, with a Law Degree, was having the remains of the buildings cleaned up too quickly.

Look, I just graduated from college with a degree in law enforcement (I'm 57) and one of my specialities was Analysis of Terrorism. I was a straight A student thoughout my classes.

New York had the largest crime scene in the history of the country, and he tells the federal government, 'well, I didn't know you wanted me to save it.'

I mean, 'com-on. A national disaster and him, above anyone else should know that you keep cilivians away from the crime scene as not to taint the evidence. But there they were, cleaning it up. They did that and scrapped the pieces and had them it melted down fast enough that the evidence had vanished...except for that one small piece that a single lady had put into a bucket of dirt that she saved. That very small piece contained the ingredients of Thermite. They had it analyzed by their independent sources, great scientific minds, and metalergists (sp) as well as chemists. These people were all gathered at a symposium in CA, and they are trying to make the truth be known, but just as everything, they need more proof than just that one single piece and they've been putting this together a little at a time.

Just be patient...they'll get it done. I don't know who put that blog site up with the info wars tapes on there, but I hope he reads this so I can say thank you. If I typoed anywhere, I'm sorry. It's almost 6 a.m. and I haven't slept much lately. It's like my mind is always keeping me guarded for the unexpected, and I watched that horrible day on TV, but I wasn't there. I'm sorry you lost your friends. I can't imagine that kind of hurt. But I lost both my parents and my second oldest sister...so I know what a loss feels like. Take care, and keep the faith.

2007-02-02 21:27:08 · answer #3 · answered by chole_24 5 · 0 2

I'm not happy. I don't wish death on anyone except murderous terrorists.

You obviosly don't know the difference between your president and a terrorist. Yes, I know you think the pres. is worse but he wouldn't slice your head off.

I think you're a misguided fool.

Darwin's theory can seem cruel but its not its only indifferent.

2007-02-02 21:29:48 · answer #4 · answered by Doug 3 · 1 0

Osama Bin Laden took down the towers and murdered nearly 3,000 innocent lives. This president has done nothing to find the mass murderer and enemy of man. If half of the resources we have squandered in Iraq were applied to finding this demon, he would have been dead long ago.

2007-02-02 21:10:31 · answer #5 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 2 1

If he tried to influence weak minded morons that President Bush was responsible for 911, then I will happily relieve myself on his grave.

Did drugs cause your problems?

2007-02-02 22:35:19 · answer #6 · answered by Feelsgood 2 · 0 0

Why would you revel in the death of any 23 year old, or anyone for that matter. Since when is our potical beliefs an excuse to wish death or be relieved when someone dies.

2007-02-02 21:04:30 · answer #7 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 1 2

If this person is indeed dead (your sources have been less than reliable or authoritative) it doesn't make me happy or sad. What does make me sad however, are people like you. Psycho liberal conspiracy theory loving whackos who want to tarnish the memories of the men & women who have sacrificied and are still sacrificing to defend your freedom and your life.

Die, scumbag.

To Kwan Kong: Osama bin Laden is dead, you dumbass.

2007-02-02 21:14:38 · answer #8 · answered by Fearless Leader 4 · 1 3

He looks like a gangster wanna be so who cares?

2007-02-02 20:54:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Ya I'm glad a cock sucker like that is dead.

2007-02-02 20:52:54 · answer #10 · answered by Nate H 2 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers