2007-02-02 19:21:21 · 11 answers · asked by Karasu 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
As Bush is doing what he believes is the right thing in actively pursuing those involved in terrorism - those who directly threaten the lives and prosperities of every citizen in the western world - any remark made against the safety he is trying to provide for us all through his actions, should be regarded as treason and THOSE people should be the ones to go to jail. So countless people in Iraq and similar places are dying......so what???? It's them or us!!! People who have a problem with his actions need to dismount their "do-gooder" horses, wake up and sniff the roses. If September 11 wasn't justification enough, then those blind enough NOT to see his actions as a means to an end, are not worth saving. Stop whining like a baby and be grateful for the life you still have, thanks to what the U.S (in conjunction with its allies) have done and hopefully will continue to do....
Ally to the U.S and damn proud of it!!
2007-02-02 20:15:56 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Riiight, since I'm sure America wouldn't be the laughing stock of the international community if that happened...
I think those who have been found guilty of breaking laws should go to jail so you'd have to actually charge him with violation of some law.
2007-02-03 03:56:43 · answer #2 · answered by d.anconia 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! It will be a good example to the world. The world will rejoice when Bush is behind bars. The price of oil will then drop in half as well.
2007-02-03 03:34:56 · answer #3 · answered by ironqqq 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you guys seem to have a disaluted veiw of what happens on a war feild. right now in iraq were doing basics in compariosion to what we could be doing. we have much better thecnolagival advancments in weponry and greater numbers than any rebleion in iraq. the probelm were facing is how we stop bomb threats and other forms of retaliation without becoming a terrorist form ourselves. the idea of sending more tropps to iraq isnt to kill more inocent people but to protect our troops in numbers and strength. if we were going there just to kill more people we would of droped an a bomb and been done with it. alot of people disagree wether or not we should be in iraq wich is open to discusion and opinon. but being ignroant in war tactics isnt going to help prove your disposition. it is a solid tactic that adding forces will increase chances of victory and reduce causilties.
2007-02-03 03:35:52 · answer #4 · answered by punktillies 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If no troops, Iraqi is stepping on the quick sand pit, more trouble and maybe civil war will break out
2007-02-03 03:32:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, no. I would agree to raise the troups ONLY if Bush goes in the front line along with his twin daughters.
2007-02-03 05:10:59 · answer #6 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, but he has to go to Abugrave Prison with the soldiers that were commanded to humiliate the Iraqi prisoners.
Same preferential treatment for him and his Engish Chum!
2007-02-07 03:14:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. More troops means more innocent lives lost. An idiot being sent to jail cannot justify those lives :)
2007-02-03 03:29:23 · answer #8 · answered by Phil 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush and Cheney should both be impeached for their utter disregard for the Constitution!
2007-02-03 03:31:59 · answer #9 · answered by sandyblondegirl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as I'd love to see that happen to him I have to say no.
2007-02-03 03:29:59 · answer #10 · answered by kitkat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋