Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she would not have attacked Iraq if she were president in 2002 and would end the war if elected, as she tried to blunt rivals like John Edwards who are stoking anti-war passions in the Democratic Party.
2007-02-02 17:22:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She is not an answer to prayers... she is the stuff of nightmares. I truly fear for this country, and my husband(a US Marine) if she where to become president.
2007-02-02 18:16:19 · answer #1 · answered by eileengallia 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
And yet she voted to support it in 2002.
Claims it was a mistake to do so, claims she was misled by the WMD case presented (yet Bush is not allowed the same "mistake", apparently).
If anyone does NOT have the right to claim they were misled by the administration, it's Hillary. The senator closest to events up leading up to the war, being married to the very recent ex-president, being part of that braintrust, and being very privy of the "truth" in Iraq. She didn't make a mistake voting then, she knew better than any that her affirmitive vote was required.
And now she's lying about her motives to advance her political position. No, She doesn't answer MY prayers.
2007-02-02 17:33:35 · answer #2 · answered by freebird 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
All politicians will pander to thier base. Also all politicians will say that they would have done differently had they been in the position to do so. Of course they would! So would alot of us! If you had the chance to redo some mistake you made would you? Some of us would others wouldn't. In any case it doesn't make sense for her to have said this, simply because her voting record indicates that she has voted *for* several measures that have helped the war effort. This will be used to say that she is a flip flopper "just like John Kerry" (not my words). Let the rhetoric begin...
2007-02-02 17:29:29 · answer #3 · answered by Flynn380 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hmmmm... not what she was saying with the intel that was gathered under her dishonorable hubby's term. She was absolutely sure then of the same things that were stated in the intel listed by Bush and crew. She is a flip-flopping, lying piece of crap. She lies almost as much as you do, erudite.
2007-02-03 01:33:32 · answer #4 · answered by DiamondDave 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i've got in basic terms made an offering to a porcelain God two times in my existence by using eating (now the flu and nutrition poisoning are a various count), however the offering replaced into made the comparable nighttime and it replaced into made without request from my area. in actuality, I undergo in recommendations guffawing even whilst the Sloe Gin washed up by using my nostrils. i replaced into wonderful the next day.
2016-12-16 20:02:10 · answer #5 · answered by forgach 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No she's not my answer who's next with you demoncrats Roger Clinton, Bill's brother ; MAYBE Jimmy Carter will grace your party with another run at it . everyone knows how weak Carter was but when demons tell the story you would think he was the best president ever but he was clearly one of the worse ever second only to Bill I never had sex with that slut Clinton
2007-02-02 18:31:21 · answer #6 · answered by MOPE DE VOPE 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hmm... I can honestly say I have never in any of my prayers asked for Hillary Clinton to do anything.
Now I have asked for wisdom, compassion and strength for our real leaders.
2007-02-02 17:27:11 · answer #7 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Is becoming a junkie an admirable thing, come on man you decide!
2007-02-02 17:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by MIke B 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
woulda coulda shoulda...
So what, all pre-Presidents lie in their campaigns. People just tend to overreact more if a Republican did it.
2007-02-02 17:32:52 · answer #9 · answered by Picard Facepalm 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is obviously a loaded question, but here goes.
NO!
2007-02-02 17:44:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋