in answer to the guy above me..
let’s begin by playing a little word association. I’ll say a word, and you think of the first word that comes to mind. Conspiracy–(pause) Theory, is what most people think of. We’ve all been conditioned the word theory with conspiracy because after all, no conspiracies could possibly be true, they are all just theories.arent they? In the phrase conspiracy theory there are two words, the first word conspiracy, the second word is,the active word, theory .a theory is a supposition, an idea, a concept, a hypothesis. Let me give you an example. If I purchase a raffle ticket I could win a prize. Now as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket, my win is theoretical. But when I do purchase raffle ticket, the win is no longer a theory, it becomes a possibility. And the more raffle tickets and I purchase the more possible and eventually–probable, the win becomes. Such is the case with a conspiracy theory. As long as there is no evidence it is a conspiracy theory. But once you have a piece of evidence, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, it becomes possibility. And the more evidence that is gathered, the more possible and eventually probable the conspiracy is.
“On September 11th, 2001, 4 events occurred within an hour and fifteen minutes occurred at 8:45 eastern standard time when American Airlines flight 11 hit the North Tower then 18 minutes later at 9:03 eastern time United Airlines flight 175 slammed into the South And then at 9:43 it was reported that American Airlines flight 77 had hit the pentagon. And United Airlines flight 93 crashed in Shanksville Pennsylvania.
Now unless this is one incredible coincidence, is it not safe to assume that all four of these events one another? And is it not also safe to assume, that if you find one person involved, or a party they’re probably involved in all of them? Well following this train of thought, since there was is it not safe to assume that those involved, those parties involved, or agencies or groups that 11, would do anything that they can to obfuscate, distract, distort or cover up any information discovery? And if that’s true, is it not also safe to assume that if you find somebody, a group, in the obfuscation, distraction, distortion, or cover up of any information involved in ANY of indicate possible involvement and even guilt in the events of 9-11?
2007-02-02 17:11:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
7⤋
Clinton's people knew something or he wouldn't have sent Sandy Berger to steal classified documents . While Bill Clinton is smiling into the camera -he's been compromising our nations national security . That Hillary has the nerve to run for any office after all their crimes - is outrageous .
2007-02-03 01:11:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
ceteris paribus guy. that was a fabulous answer.! im still in level 1 or i would have given you a thumbs up. i curse all those five blockheads who gave you thumbsdowns!!
2007-02-03 04:36:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by nickie 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, this is what the conspiracy theorists would like you to think
2007-02-03 01:11:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by bad_bob_69 7
·
6⤊
1⤋