can she do the job as well as a man.
Will she be judged for being a woman.
How will she be treated.
2007-02-02 17:05:03 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Oops, I'm a Malaysian! But I know there's a woman running for president, she's short-haired. I think she'll do better than Gw Bush.
2007-02-02 17:09:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh man, a monkey just gave a thoughful analysis of the American political system and Hillary Clinton's chances for president.
"I think the country is mature enough to handle a anyone in the office of president..." -okay Monkey Boy, real mature.
"the real issue is whether someone's qualification to be president is that it is a woman, a black, an Alaskan, an astronaut or some other representative group with an agenda." -oh, you mean like qualified like used to own a baseball team?
"So far, we have seen no agendas, however with Hillary, we do see a fair number of negative qualifications." pthththththththt!
"She lived the power of the presidency, she pushed her agenda as first lady (and it got nowhere). We have seen what she is about and it isn;t really pleasant. We can do better for president," -blah blah blah go throw your own poop Monkey
Yes she can do the job as well as a man. Yes she will be judged for being a woman. Yes she will be treated horribly, she already has been for the last 16 years since Bill started running for Pres.
2007-02-02 17:46:22 · answer #2 · answered by johnnybassline 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why shouldn't a woman be allowed to run for president? Why could or not that is allowed? that is going to somewhat be huge-spread as a probability. If women human beings have the right to vote etc. and meet the criteria to develop into president then for sure they ought to run. that is an significant change. As may an African-American president. i imagine that a unique attitude can be a welcomed change.
2016-11-24 20:31:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that a woman would do well in the Oval Office, given she was qualified for the job. Many assume one is sexist if they say they are skeptical about a woman president, when in fact, its wise to know about a candidate's beliefs and morals before placing their vote. You cannot make generalizations when referring to women in politics, such as asking if she would do as well as a man and how she'd be treated. If a woman runs for president, runs a good campaign, and can prove to America that she can lead America into a desirable direction in the next 4 or 8 years, then the country will respond, and she will be president. It does not really depend on the sex of the candidate, but the candidate themself.
2007-02-02 17:30:34 · answer #4 · answered by aero 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the country is mature enough to handle a anyone in the office of president...the real issue is whether someone's qualification to be president is that it is a woman, a black, an Alaskan, an astronaut or some other representative group with an agenda.
So far, we have seen no agendas, however with Hillary, we do see a fair number of negative qualifications. She lived the power of the presidency, she pushed her agenda as first lady (and it got nowhere). We have seen what she is about and it isn;t really pleasant. We can do better for president,
2007-02-02 17:18:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Okay.
1. She can easily do the job as well as a man.
2. Maybe by some stupid people but results are what matter in the end.
3. Like any other president.... made fun of on comedy shows, criticized in the news and respected and adored overall... depending on her performance of course...
I can certainly vote for a woman....
2007-02-02 17:12:34 · answer #6 · answered by kroe_6 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The US electorate doesn't think anymore. They are now fully ready to abide by the Party politic. The ghost of the Comintern is victorious.
So it doesn't matter. Ionesco's "The Leader" will suit Hillary very well. Obama will agree: better to not end up like Vince Foster...
Me bad. Me gonna get shoved into cattle car to re-education camp for saying this....
2007-02-02 17:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it'd be great, personally. However, I'm not so sure about Clinton... she's not my favorite. I really don't think we should vote for a woman for president just because she is a woman, but if any woman really was the best person for the job, she would get my vote.
2007-02-02 17:14:50 · answer #8 · answered by Christina 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
other countries have had women presidents/prime ministers.....it wouldn't be that big of a deal from a wordly perspective, but from a US perspective it would be neat because she'd be the first woman to hold that position in this country's history. It would be interesting to say the least......you know what they say about a woman's scorn.....well as long as she doesn't freak out and nuke a country cause someone got to her.......then I'd be okay with her. hehe
2007-02-02 17:15:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think many people want to vote for her JUST because she is a woman. However, I think policies and those tied by political alliances are important, and I will vote against the only one running - this time.
Margaret Thatcher, I would have voted for.
2007-02-03 03:22:42 · answer #10 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋