Hilary Clinton said today that if she had been elected in 2002, we would not be at war with Iraq....?

Question

Does anyone believe that BULL S***????
-SHE VOTED FOR THE WAR!!!!!!!

I'm not lying, she said it....seems like she just lies whenever she wants to meet public opinion.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070203/ap_on_el_pr/democrats2008;_ylt=AjRqgVW1uLLAbUTSms.Hev2s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--

Answer 1

That is a load if i ever heard it she is a turncoat in words and action...

Answer 2

Liberals are self loathing creatures.

That explains a lot of what they do that makes no sense.

Liberals are the new fascist Nazi's.

They can't tolerate any opinion different than their's.

Look what they do to college speakers. They throw urine, pies, pull fire alarms, start fights, etc etc, to keep conservative's from speaking.

They want to pass laws to eliminate talk radio.

Liberals are intolerant, bigoted fascists, incapable of allowing free speech.

Islamicfascists have pledged to murder you and me.

Liberals want to help them.

Conservatives want to fight them.

Liberalism is ok when it is practiced.

But todays America's liberals, are not real liberals.

They are against change of all types and devoid of new idea's or solutions to problems.

Conservatives offered many new programs and initiatives the last 6 years, and liberals always fought against them, with never an original idea or solution to offer in return.


Liberals love it whan a woman murders a child that is unborn but hate it when criminals who rape, murder and commit attrocities get the death penality.

In reality the liberals of today are Stalinists and Marxists. Their belief that government is the solution to all problems and no wealth should be privately owned is what drives todays liberals.

They are also anti-American. They believe America is the worlds problem and the world would be better off without America in it.

Liberals are all for forsaking the poor weak and downtrodden if America's military is involved in keeping them alive, but insist on keeping America's poor weak and downtrodden in their miserable existance because of 'political correctness', (New Orleans and any urban city).

Answer 3

Yes she did, and even went so far as to say Bush twisted her vote in some way, I didn't catch the whole thing but she was trying to get out of admitting she did the vote. She has flip flopped so many times on this how can she be trusted to run a country? She's worried that the war she voted for won't be settled in 2008 cause she doesn't think it's fair the next president should be handed the problem!

Answer 4

Well, let's quibble over terminology: We are NOT now at war with Iraq! We are in a war in Iraq!

I'm a liberal Liberal, and usually vote as a Dem. (Not always...I think for myself) but I'm getting kind of sick of Ms. Clinton. Yes, she voted for us to go into Iraq, and now she says that was wrong. OK, I have no problem with someone admitting he/she was wrong and changing their stance on an issue. I wish more people (for instance: Dubya) could and would do it.

BUT, if she was president, and if she DID think it was right to go in when we did, and if she then changed her mind, I think we would still be in the stand off that we are in now. How would she have gone about getting us out?

She's starting to really tick me off!

Answer 5

It she was president we might be in a civil war, because the first thing that thing would want to do is to take away the 1st and 2nd Amendments. I don't think she would yank them out of the constitution, but over time through shaded ways. Shaded ways such as new laws hate speach. If they hate what you say, or say that you said something out of hate, than you would be arrested. She would continue putting bans on certain firearms, and signing into act more laws that are only imposed on law abidding citizens who are allowed to have guns. That woman scares me to my core, for a lot of reasons. She is a new world order communist hag. I pray to God that that thing does not ever get elected for anything ever again. I wouldn't trust her to be a dog catcher. I sure don't trust her with the country.

Answer 6

If Hillary had been elected President in 2002, we would have had the War on Decency, not the War On Terror. First thing on her agenda if she's elected Madame President in 2008: No more little blue dresses.

Answer 7

i'm sure we wouldn't be. we'd be too busy fighting for our rights to keep our guns and to keep our money.that way the terrorists could come back and do as they pleased.

what do they care, as long as they get votes?

i see lots of you blaming Bush for bad intelligence. why has no one ever admitted that Clinton had the same bad intelligence? read this:

Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike

CLINTON: Good evening.

Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.

Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.

Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.
{SNIP}
The international community had good reason to set this requirement. Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq.
{SNIP}

READ THIS PART CLOSELY:
The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world.

The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people. Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort. We will strengthen our engagement with the full range of Iraqi opposition forces and work with them effectively and prudently.

Answer 8

She, like many members of Congress, voted for the war because they believed the information the Bush White house was giving them. They were not aware at the time that this administration was lying and falsifying information to justify going to war. I believe that if anyone other than Bush or Cheney or Rumsfeld were in the Presidents seat, we would never have gone into Iraq! We are there because of lies and deceit by this President and his administration, and we are losing the war because of its incompetence!

Answer 9

Is she still lying through her teeth and smiling.....what a jerk...

she voted for the war with Iraq and now she is denying this....
besides she didn't run in 2002, thank the Lord.

I like McCain or Guliani.....as Republican candidates and
I like Obama as a Democratic Candidate, maybe even Edwards

The Clintons are such liars......Billl could have captured
OsamabinLaden, but was so busy with Monica L. the he
neglected his duties......

Answer 10

Everyone voted for the war, dingus. When your president lies to you and falsifies documents, you tend to believe him. Now that the truth has been revealed would she or any of them vote for the war again? So we should blame the people who thought they were doing the right thing because the commander in chief lied to them? Do you think about your questions before you ask them? Do you remember the circumstances surrounding the congressional vote for the funding of the war? Or did you just tune into American Politics this morning?

Answer 11

Thats difficult the presidential election was in 2000 and 2004 so what election is she talking about.