English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-02 16:03:04 · 11 answers · asked by True Grit 2 in Politics & Government Politics

.
I apologize for using the "H" word.

2007-02-02 16:09:18 · update #1

11 answers

I didn't know they were but I would assume they are talking about the 3 times in the mid and late 1990s that the CIA and special forces had Bin Laden in their sites and were denied clearance for a "go" by President Clinton. Yes, 911 hadn't happened yet. But Bin Laden had attacked us plenty of times and was considered the #1 terrorist in the world in the late 90s. jason

2007-02-02 16:12:26 · answer #1 · answered by Magic Mouse 6 · 1 1

Apology accepted - just don't do it again.

Fact is, there's plenty of blame to go around concerning the events and policies which led up to the events of 9/11, and people seem to get obsessed with either trying to point the blame or trying to defend themselves from the people who are pointing.
It's gets so confusing at times that we seem to leave the Islamic terrorist dirt bags out of the equation.
I think the we had problems and lapses - no doubt - but I also think we should place the blame where it truly belongs - with the terrorists and their demented ideology.

2007-02-03 00:25:30 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 0

To most in the right wing, Clinton is responsible for everything from sunspots to bad hair days to 9/11. I didn't care too much for Clinton, especially because of his moral lapses, but he did a good job as President. Clinton is 1,729,652,486 times better than Bush ever was. And the Republicans can't stand that, so they blame Clinton for everything.

2007-02-03 00:07:37 · answer #3 · answered by some_guy_times_50 4 · 2 1

Here's a picture of a Hannity supporter:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/images/morans.jpg

2007-02-03 00:06:29 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2 3

No American living today will forget what happened on September 11, 2001. Each of us will remember how the serenity of that bright morning was destroyed by a savage atrocity, an act so hostile we could scarcely imagine any human being capable of it. The realization sank into the hearts of every one of us: America was vulnerable and under attack. On September 11, evil literally took flight.

But as 19 men showed the world their worst, we Americans displayed what makes our country great: courage and heroism, compassion and generosity, unity and resolve. We were united, first in sorrow and anger, then in recognition that we were attacked not for a wrong we had done, but for who we are--a people united in a kinship of ideals, committed to the notion that the people are sovereign, and that people everywhere, no matter what their race or country or religion, possess certain universal and inalienable rights. In that moment, we were not different races. We were not poor or rich. We were not Democrat or Republican, liberal or conservative. We were not two countries.

We were Americans.

As Americans, we acted swiftly. We liberated Afghanistan from the murderous rule of the Taliban, our attackers' proud hosts. We chased Al Qaeda around the globe. We revamped our homeland security, reorganized our intelligence community, and advocated reform in calcified societies.

We did these things because it was clear a new page had turned in history's book. The terrorists who attacked America were clear about their intentions. Bin Laden and his ilk have perverted a peaceful religion, devoting it not to the salvation of souls but to the destruction of bodies. They wish to destroy us, to bring the world under totalitarian rule according to some misguided religious fantasy. Our cherished ideals of freedom, equality, and religious tolerance stand in their way.

And so they fight us. Their fight is no secret; September 11 was the most horrific of a long string of attacks, from the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 to the 1998 embassy bombings in Africa to the 2000 attack on the U.S.S. Cole. Al Qaeda does not hide its hand in these crimes; rather, it boasts of its destruction and calls for more.

But though the evidence for Al Qaeda's central role in the 9/11 attacks is overwhelming, many have found the facts unsatisfying. Perhaps this is understandable. We want to believe that 19 men could not murder our citizens, destroy our grandest buildings, and terrorize our country. Surely, something more was at work.

Such sentiments are not new. Many Americans have resisted the notion that an island nation far from our shores could launch a surprise attack against our Navy; that Communism could remain viable in the world without assistance within the U.S. government itself; that one man in a book depository could end the life of a beloved president.

We would like to think there was something more at work on September 11--something hidden, more sophisticated, something as grand as the lives so easily destroyed. Those unsatisfied with the ordinary truth of the attacks have concocted stories more fanciful, more conspiratorial than the events as we know them. Others have done the same for more nefarious reasons. Some, accustomed to viewing U.S. actions as the wellspring of global problems, cannot accept that others wrought evil here. Political extremists peddle explanations that support their ideologies. And still others deliberately fabricate damaging tales.
This conspiracy-mongering is no small phenomenon. Any Internet search will turn up thousands of explanations for the events of September 11.These theories come in nearly infinite variety, but all reach essentially the same conclusion: that the U.S. government, or some shadowy group that controls it, organized the attacks as part of a master plan for global domination. But the truth is more mundane. The philosopher Hannah Arendt described the banality of Nazi evil; the 9/11 hijackers were also ordinary, uninteresting men with twisted beliefs.

In the immediate aftermath of their attacks, all of us had questions. Why didn't we have better intelligence? How could our airport security be so poor? Why weren't we better prepared? Who carried out these attacks, and why? All good questions, and thousands of dedicated Americans, both in and out of government, have worked hard to answer them. Journalists, the 9/11 Commission, Congressional investigators, academic researchers, and others have reconstructed these terrible events in extraordinary detail. Much of what we have learned has been frustrating, even infuriating. Anger can be healthy when it spurs a commitment to change. But it is corrosive and dangerous when it curdles into paranoia and suspicion.

Blaming some conspiracy within our government for the horrific attacks of September 11 mars the memories of all those lost on that day. There were errors and missteps in our government's response, to be sure, but the performance of our public servants was on the whole heroic, not destructive. For their service--for their lives--we are indebted, and we are obliged to pay our debts to those who sacrificed. To blame not a gang of terrorists but some conspiracy for September 11 insults the police officers and firefighters who raced into the burning towers; the men and women who left for dangerous, distant lands to fight our enemies; and those who have fought in all the wars of our history.

Any explanation for the tragedy of September 11 must start and end with the facts. The evidence, the data, the facts must be gathered, compiled, analyzed, and then--only then--can conclusions be drawn as to what happened. That is precisely what the various investigators have done, and in so doing they have performed a great service to our nation. And yet still the conspiracy theorists peddle their wares.

They ignore the methods of science, the protocols of investigation, and the dictates of logic. The conspiracy theorists chase any bit of information, no matter how flimsy, and use it to fit their preordained conclusions. They ascribe to the government, or to some secretive group, powers wholly out of proportion to what the evidence suggests. And they ignore the facts that are present in plain sight.

We cannot let these tales go unanswered. The 9/11 conspiracy movement exploits the public's anger and sadness. It shakes Americans' faith in their government at a time when that faith is already near an all-time low. It traffics in ugly, unfounded accusations of extraordinary evil against fellow Americans. And, as we have seen recently in the Iranian president's bizarre letter to President Bush, it has even entered the currency of international affairs.

The conspiracy theories are a distraction from the proper lessons of 9/11, from what is truly important to this country. And so it is imperative to confront them with the facts. The authors of this book, through their extensive reporting, disprove these tales of conspiracy. They show that, without exception, the stories are based on misconceptions, distortions, and outright lies. The CIA was not involved in 9/11. Our military did not bring about the destruction of the World Trade Center. Bombs or missiles did not fell the towers. A white jet aircraft did not shoot down Flight 93.

2007-02-03 00:37:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because the "Party of personal responsibility" is anything but.

2007-02-03 00:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by barringtonbreathesagain 2 · 0 1

you said the "Hannity" word again, stop that I almost puked.

2007-02-03 00:06:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I don't want to be afraid.... you be afraid.

2007-02-03 01:59:18 · answer #8 · answered by plebes02 3 · 0 0

Hannity is a moron. Period.

2007-02-03 00:07:39 · answer #9 · answered by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 · 2 2

because they are Republicans

2007-02-03 00:06:58 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers