I think Howard Dean should run again, at least he knew Iraq was a bad idea and said it back in the days when we were not allowed to say anything against our president
2007-02-02 15:13:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pretty_Bad_Logic 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because she knows the entire reason that Bush wanted war with Iraq was to clean up the mess Bush Sr. left behind.
Hillary would not have had the same incentive to start a war that had absolutely nothing to do with WMD or the terrorism that led to 9/11. Therefore, she would not have gone to war then. Instead, she might have focused better on finding Osama and might have done so.
Either way, I will be voting for her. She's the best candidate so far. And she's the most intelligent. And after Bush, god knows we NEED a president with a brain.
2007-02-02 23:15:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by grrluknow 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
She not only voted to give Bush the authority to go, she also gave a speech to a group of women called Code Pink in 2002 stating the reasons why we needed to go based on 10 years of her own research. Then she turns around and says that she was decieved by Bush and his administration. Go figure.
2007-02-02 23:51:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Clinton's are not leaders so much as political opportunists. Hillary is not in the process of attempting an "Oprahfication" of her image as a kind and caring nurturer. Nothing could be further from the truth. She is a woman who let a man treat her like dirt for the sake of her political aspirations.
If Hillary took a poll that said they wanted her to turn America into a European socialism (And they are all floundering) she would do it in an instant.
2007-02-02 23:21:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eric K 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush was somewhat more motivated. His great Grandfather sold Steel to the Nazis and was one of the founders of the Military industrial complex. So I'll leave you to figure why war is always a good thing for the Bush family.
2007-02-02 23:26:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The intelligence was manipulated by the administration to appear as if we had to go to war with Iraq. Congress voted to give the administration the power to go to war on that intelligence. Most Democrats and many Republicans say they would not have voted for the war in Iraq had the evidence not been "Filtered" the way it was. "Scooter" is on trial right now BECAUSE of the filtering procedures used. Can you say "CON"? Sure you can.
2007-02-02 23:19:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by sluttyfawne 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because as democrats often do - they say whatever sounds the best to provide the best chance for them to obtain the power. Since most Americans actually find war a disgusting, unneeded way to solve their problems they will probably vote for her just because of her message. I think most of us realize if we give it a thought that war is sometimes a necessary thing since different cultures will not get along no matter what. Help us Ralph Nader. lol.
2007-02-02 23:22:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by friendly advice from maine 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because Bush fed everyone a bunch of lies. If she had been president, she would have had access to the information.
PS I detest Hillary just so you know.
2007-02-02 23:15:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by na n 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I guess because she was like alot of people, that didn't know Bush was going after the oil and revenge for his Dad. He lead everyone to think it was due to 9/11 and WMD, when all along he should have been going after Old Bin!
2007-02-02 23:19:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by B 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Its because the Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package of lies!
Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:
-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed socialized medicine healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She not presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud
-- Hates the military, but acts like she likes them to get into office.
We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking "B", the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??!
Please, we need a change!!!
.
.
2007-02-02 23:13:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by charles 1
·
1⤊
5⤋