English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-02 13:18:51 · 7 answers · asked by Mindblast 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

7 answers

pl and sp otherwsie there both ace.

2007-02-02 13:41:24 · answer #1 · answered by Emily N 3 · 1 0

No difference because there's no space but only place that you can sense through shapes. Or maybe what we call space are those same shapes. Or maybe there's time, space, place and more and we can't learn about them because we cannot sense them.

Anthing is possible in this huge Universe that we're just beginning to know, but our condition is based on limitation. If we cannot sense it(measure), how can we prove it? On the other hand, if we measure by unconventional senses, then it's too weird and it would not prove anything either. Are we afraid of having no Space-Time?

Oh well, I'll tell you a secret....Space=Infinity and Time=Eternity...hush..don't tell anyone!0!

2007-02-02 13:47:15 · answer #2 · answered by Alex 5 · 0 0

Philosophy? Perhaps? Science? Um, maybe. I offer this anaology, in my opinion.

I can be in a PLACE; even one I consider my own, but feel as if I have little or no SPACE of my own within it.

Steven Wolf

2007-02-02 13:25:36 · answer #3 · answered by DIY Doc 7 · 0 0

place is a location. space surrounds place.

2007-02-02 13:24:43 · answer #4 · answered by Sophist 7 · 1 0

Place is something space is the absence of "something"

2007-02-02 13:45:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Damn sophists and their minds!

2007-02-02 13:25:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

nothing

2007-02-02 13:45:23 · answer #7 · answered by cherry 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers