If Bush attacks Iran, who would be the good guys and who would be the bad guys?

Question

Seems to me the people who haven't attacked anyone in 250 years would be the good guys.
And the people who can't stop killing would be the bad guys.

Feeling - were the Iranians the ones who raped children in Abu Ghraib? Were Iranians really the ones who invaded Iraq? How blind can you be?

Iranian students taking over a building in Tehran is hardly an invasion.

brooks b are you one of those "smart liberals" who can't handle free speech?

Answer 1

Very VERY good question. Honestly this is the first question I don't have an answer too. Kudos.

Answer 2

"The operations of the AGIR are geared in direction of uneven conflict and much less classic duties. those comprise the administration of smuggling, administration of the Strait of Hormoz, and resistance operations.[5] for this reason, the region of the AGIR will supplement the greater classic place of the nicely-known Iranian defense force with the two forces working one after the different and specializing in distinctive operational roles.[6] The AGIR have been formed in might 1979 as a rigidity dependable to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, yet later grew to become an entire defense force rigidity alongside the army interior the Iran-Iraq conflict. It develop into infamous for its human wave assaults which includes for the period of Operation Ramadan, an attack on the city of Basra." nicely like it or no longer, they do no longer seem to be a usual defense force rigidity. they are led via non secular leaders and not the expensive Iranian goverment (whom they are generally at odds with). They traditionally and on the instant are created from extremists (which many might call terrorists) mujahadin that have self belief non-muslims could be killed. If plainly like a terrorist, claims to be a terrorists, smells like a terrorist, operates like a terrorist and assaults us... why no longer label it a terrorist? Are we so worried approximately worldwide opinion we do not have a appropriate to call an enemy an enemy? i'm nonetheless attempting to choose how labling the IRGC as something equates to the assertion of "Martial regulation?" end attempting to be a scaremongerer. You suck at it. Martial regulation conspiracies have been over used for years and now that is basically previous.

Answer 3

Our troops would be good guys, the Iranian military would be the bad guys, and Iranian and Israeli civilians would be the dead guys.

Iranians attacked the US in 1979, and attack Israel by proxy using the Lebanese.

Answer 4

That's a matter of perspective.

I haven't heard the US deny the Holocaust and say that Israel is nearing extinction though.

But hey, that's just me.

Oh, and Iran has been sending assassins into Iraq for some time now to kill American soldiers which I believe qualifies as an attack in any nation.

Pick your side and choose wisely.

Answer 5

It all depends on the hat color.

This might be a good time to get a white Army helmet contract.

Go big Red Go

Answer 6

Are you retarded? People like you make smart liberals like me look stupid. Keep your mouth shut please.

EDIT:
Listen Mr. Hippie... I respect your right to say whatever you want, but what I can't stand is that people like you make all liberals look stupid when you insinuate that Iran's government is somehow better than the US government. Yes, Bush is a complete fool. Yes, invading Iraq was a horrible CHOICE, and was done under completely false pretenses. Yes, Bush is the worst president in my lifetime (which is impressive because Reaguns was pretty damn horrible). BUT - Iran is a THEOCRACY run by intollerant psychopathic ultra-conservative muslims. These people are a MUCH bigger threat to world peace than any mainstream American conservative will ever be. These people are holocaust deniers for f***'s sake.

Just think before you speak, please. If you really think about it - you'll realize that Iran should never be allowed to have nuclear weapons. As much as I hate war, military action may be our only option. I pity you if you can't see why a country like Iran can't be allowed to have a weapon capable of destroying an entire city at one time.

I appologize for calling you retarded, just use your head... please.

Answer 7

Good question. I wonder if any country has a handle on the truth? How can one or a group of countries have sole possession of a bomb(s)? I don't believe politicians from any country including our own as they have told lies in the past to justify their goals.

The history of the world is written by the victors...always has and always will be. It makes you wonder who or what is the truth?
Nobody has learned from their history.
So Sad.

Answer 8

You mean the Iranians who hung a 16 year old girl because she was raped, are the good guys? The ones who are attacked Iraq!

ROTFL

Answer 9

What country would you rather live in?

A country that hangs homosexuals? (Iran)
A country that does not hang homosexuals (USA)

A country where you can post BS, anti-US, bullsh*t questions on the internet (USA)

A country where internet usage is strictly regulated (IRAN)

A country that denies the holocaust (Iran)
A country that helped end the holocaust (USA)

I'm sticking with USA. Have fun in Iran LHFP.

Answer 10

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are ALWAYS the GOOD GUYS.
Didn't Iran take a bunch of our people as hostages for MANY months years back...
Do WE ever take HOSTAGES from other countries? AHhhh - NO

Answer 11

Haven't attacked anyone in 250 years? What was that incident in 1979 then, asking our embassy to tea? You might want to look closer at history there, and pay attention to the threats Iran is issuing.