Like FDR? Complete with media black outs and arrests for treason,internment camps for all Muslims,rationing of everything,the whole economy devoted only to war?
2007-02-02 12:29:12 · 12 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Democrates are not devoted to war! thats thier problem! I think he is doing a good job as a republican
lol, is ur pic, picard as borg?
2007-02-02 12:54:42 · answer #1 · answered by Gods Girl...check my new profile 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you in basic terms choose for votes to bypass a bill. It does not take any votes, to no longer approve a investment bill. If no investment bill is authorized. there is not any longer something for the Republicans to block, And no longer something for the President to Veto. Congress has to bypass yet another investment bill this month. without investment bill, the troops might desire to come lower back abode. regardless of if the president likes it or no longer. So the Democrats do have all the potential and administration they choose for. The Democrats have comprehensive administration of what expenses get presented and what expenses may well be voted on. The question is, have they have been given the political braveness to apply it or no longer. so a ways, the respond has been NO, they do no longer. And confident, i agree, the Democrats could get slammed in the event that they they did with carry a investment bill. i think of after the final Bush veto, the democrats might desire to have stood business enterprise. And instructed Bush, wonderful, you vetoed the investment bill. Now stay with the implications. And re-voted on the right comparable bill and sent it back to Bush. As many cases as needed, earlier Bush time-honored it. . by potential of ways, Im a Republican. And as i see it, Bush is prepared to pay the fee for what he believes is the spectacular ingredient to do. does not count if I trust him or no longer. yet so a ways, the Democrats are no longer prepared to pay the fee for what they think of is physically powerful. Untill that differences, no longer something will substitute. And opposite to commonplace opinion, combating investment, won't give up nutrition and supplies for the troops.
2016-12-16 19:52:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, FDR didn't invent World War II, nor lied to the public about it. So no comparison. Bush would LIKE Americans to see him in the same light as FDR, but at best he'd be lucky to be viewed as favorably as Hamburglar.
(cute avatar!)
2007-02-02 13:00:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Bush showed that he wasn't qualified to run a war at all. It should have been run by the military (which we PAY the to do) instead of the politicians. This entire mess would have been avoided if it would have been done that way. The military had advised Bush against going into Iraq, stating that you can't win a war against religious fanatics. Too bad GW didn't listen, huh??
2007-02-02 12:34:01 · answer #4 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
the war is basically over... they don't really need more guns, tanks planes and ammo (well some, but overall there isn't a huge demand like WWII)... so no...
we just don't have a clue how to put humpity dumpty back together again... at least the way we want to "put him back together"...
this is basically an attempt at nation building in an area where civil war has been brewing for centuries...
the times are changing... you may want to catch up...
2007-02-02 12:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Devote the whole economy to war? How would one do that in this day and age when most of our manufacturing base has gone overseas?
2007-02-02 12:34:23 · answer #6 · answered by neooxyconservative 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
now there's an idea. But I say take it up one more step.... make the contained muslims watch re runs of 30something and cop rock. Then they would be more than willing to listen to the US! lol
2007-02-02 12:34:43 · answer #7 · answered by Chrissy 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Of course not.
He shouldn't "run this war" at all. The Generals should.
Bush is a politician, and politicians really, really suck at fighting wars.
Look at Vietnam.
2007-02-02 12:35:56 · answer #8 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Like FDR - sure.
The current Democrats would have us surrendering!
2007-02-02 12:56:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
well, maybe not that extent, but end the f'n PC
2007-02-02 12:32:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋