i think not
it'll be really close between chicago and la
and i would go with la
2007-02-02 12:13:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think it will be between Chicago and Rio. For Chicago to get the olympics in 2016 they will halve to be selected by the USOC as the US host city. Rio is having some trouble at the moment with Pan Aremerican Games. However if they have a sucressful games it will help them in there bid to host 2016 Olympics.
The applications to the International Olympic Committee are due by September 15, 2007.
International pundits believe that the host city will most likely be in North America because cities from Asia, Australia and Europe have been selected as hosts for the four most recent Olympic Games. The front-runners of the North American selection are seen to be Chicago and Los Angeles, unless, that is, Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia or the Middle East - areas that have never hosted the Olympic Games (with the exception of the 1968 Mexico City Olympic Games) - can convince the International Olympic Committee otherwise.
On September 1, 2006 Rio de Janeiro was named by the Brazilian Olympic Committee as an applicant for the 2016 Games. The city is now preparing to play host to the 2007 Pan American Games, which will be the key proving ground for an Olympic bid. [citation needed] Rio de Janeiro launched applications to host the 2004 and 2012 Olympics, but failed to make the shortlist on both occasions. If the 2007 PAG turns out to be a logistical success, it may propel Rio de Janeiro as a serious contender when the bidding cycle for the 2016 Olympic Games begin. Furthermore, the IOC is eager to have either South America or Africa host the games.
Brazil has had experience in organizing large-scale sporting events in the past: Brazil organized and hosted the 1950 FIFA World Cup and is organizing a bid to host the 2014 event, and São Paulo organized the 4th Pan American Games in 1963. Subsequently, due to the continental rotation policy taken by FIFA that will place the 2014 FIFA World Cup in South America, CONMEBOL has unanimously nominated Brazil as its candidate to host the 2014 FIFA World Cup, with FIFA making its final decision sometime in 2008. São Paulo, BrasÃlia and Curitiba have also mentioned that want to make a bid [citation needed], therefore, the Brazilian Olympic Committee may have to choose between these four cities. The features to Rio 2007 has a big structure that includes a big stadium called João Havelange, that you can see in this site.
Check wikapedia
2007-02-03 17:48:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by uoptiger_79 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion, it's more than likely. There's an unwritten agreement between NBC and the IOC that the Summer Games will be in the US every 20 years because of NBC's enormous television contract with the IOC. LA has already had the Olympics twice, and Chicago seems to be developing a strong plan that would put events in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.
2007-02-03 13:29:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cha Chi 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I beleive that is will get the USOC nomination over Los Angeles but I see the 2016 Summer Olympics either going to Rio de Janiero, Brazil.
2007-02-03 11:25:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope not.
LA has had experience hosting the Olympics (1932 and 1984), and they can do it.
2007-02-03 10:06:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by luke_r1996 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope not as nowadays the Olympics are not profitable for governments (taxpayers).
2007-02-02 19:51:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by gosh137 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think the Olympic will be going to the African next
2007-02-02 19:51:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by kimht 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm still hoping for LA but it would be cool enough if it was in the USA!
2007-02-02 19:47:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mapmeep 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope not. I really wanted San Francisco, but it dropped out. I'd rather it be in another U.S. city (not Chicago or L.A.) but I think they are our only contenders.
2007-02-02 21:42:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by penguine's mom 2
·
0⤊
2⤋