He was for the war but now against, wants to pull out and cut off funding, says it's morally the right thing to do. What say you?
2007-02-02 10:44:23 · 4 answers · asked by americanmalearlington 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
John Edwards ignores reality in favor of His twisted ideas of good and evil. The idea that he has a poor background when He is one of the richest men in NC must be based on his twisted mind. He gave up the Senate just as He would give up the country instead of holding a position, other than spread eagle or bent over.
2007-02-02 11:46:53 · answer #1 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course. Democrats have always had cut and run as part of their political platform. Where have you been the last 30 years? Morals have nothing to do with it. THe free abortion and condom party has morals? Cut it out...Your killin me.......
2007-02-02 18:53:09 · answer #2 · answered by Rich S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We based our opinions on reports we trust. Bush lied and /or mislead and many were tricked. Withdrawal worked in Vietnam and it will work in Iraq too. Remember the first casualty in war is truth.
2007-02-02 18:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by Terrania 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was never for the war, that's a huge mistake on your part and shows that you are uninformed on this issue and not to be taken seriously. That's what say me.
2007-02-02 18:46:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋