Do accountability problems and complacency plague the women's movement of today?

Question

And if so, what are the effects? A related side note: I think that "nice guys" of today need to be a lot more careful and somewhat more aware of their shortcomings.

Answer 1

Yes-every ism, left unchecked, (including feminism) has a tendency to go out of control. All of history is filled with examples of this.

Ideas like Communism get started out as an ideal and soon spiral into corruption and even genocide. Today's extreme feminists are delving into Gendercide; thousands of men like my brother have already comitted suicide over false domestic violence.

The Hillary Jugend are here, they are the SA for the New World Order. The SS is Homeland Security. The Final Solution for men is here-outsouce jobs, take children away from divorced fathers, no health insurance, laws that
are prejudiced against men etc.

How can a man pay child support when his industry is now in China and illegal aliens are taking lots of jobs that American men used to do? Feminists have made argueing illegal. That's insane (false domestic violence.)

American laws & freedom were built from you are innocent till proven guilty. Only men today are guilty till proven innocent. And what of the increasing army of fatherless boys? What will happen to them?

Cartoons today call fathers "losers" and show boys & sisters beating up their fathers!! If that's not out of control then someone is in denial.

Not only that but today (like in Nazi Germany) it has become socially illegal to discuss this. Watch the insults fly...plus marriages last for a few months today. Millions of men have sworn off getting married and refuse to live with women because of the change in laws.

What goes around comes around as every revolution shows.

Answer 2

Yes - they create evidence that feminism is about domination over men rather than equality.

This isn't necessarily true or course, but that's the effect lack of accountability has in the end - it leaves the movement looking like a sham.

If I see a women that wants to pilot military jets that can hack the training and actually is the equal of men compared to UNBIASED standards without needing to be gender normed, that is a powerful argument for feminism.

If I see a woman that wants to pilot military jets that can't hack the training and isn't on a performance level the equal of men compared to standards even after being gender normed but is there because politics and political correctness demand equal representation based on population demographics, that is a powerful argument against feminism.

Remember the idea is who can pilot the plane best - that's it. In this example, its about performance. To keep a qualified woman out is wrong and to displace a qualified man to make room for an unqualified women simply to meet a quota is just as wrong.

Gender shouldn't really be a factor when performance is the only thing that matters. The enemy doesn't care if you can pull back on the stick hard enough to avoid getting shot down or not - they are not going to care if there is a woman or a man behind the stick if said woman or man is shooting at them - they, like they should, are following orders and trying to survive.

A dogfight doesn't give a crap about gender norming. There is no such thing as political correctness when you are in a foxhole.

I think most women and men want women to be treated as the woman in situation one - its only fair.

Political correctness, the extreme side of feminism however likes to look for other reasons - the system is set up to favor men, we need quotas, etc.,.... That kind of thinking is a disservice to everyone in many different ways.

Yes, I am a feminist.... In the sense of fairness. I am not a feminist when it comes to empowerment - its not fair for either gender to be more empowered than the other. I'm not into feminism as in femi-firsters either - its not fair for either gender to get preferential or special treatment over the other.

Answer 3

I think most people who do that are jealous of healthy romantic relationships because (for whatever reason) they haven't been able to find one for themselves. I think that their objective is to make a seemingly happy couple argue or get angry at each other, in an attempt to make the instigator feel that their dysfunctional relationships are normal. Also, some people are just a**holes that like to see everyone else miserable.