Hi,
Note for Akkita: For your information, there is no such word as outed, the word is ousted. Plame was ousted by the CIA in 1990 as a smoke screen for setting her up to be able to operate as a NOC CIA agent. An NOC is so top secret, they are made to appear to not exist, so I am afraid you are way out in left field on your answer, and I really feel bad having to tell you that.
Scooter Libby is on the chopping bock but was working directly for cheney as cheney's gofer boy, but you know who is going to take the fall.
Just like dumbsfeld took the fall for Iraq war, when bush was calling all the shots.
I wouldn't trust cheney to be able to grab his own a s s using both hands.
bush likes having no brainy cheney around, as he makes bush look like a genius, and bush has often been referred to as the village idiot, and for good reason. . . . . . .duh,. . . .uh,. . . .duh.
Darryl S.
2007-02-02 10:55:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
As the CIA ousted her in the 1990's do you think it was all a plot by Clinton?
The press informed that the CIA itself "inadvertently" compromised Plame by not taking appropriate measures to safeguard classified documents that the Agency routed to the Swiss embassy in Havana.
What I get for using a limited spell check..........
2007-02-02 10:44:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Akkita 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
President Bush gave him the authority to de-classify, I'm sure there is a memo somewhere stating this was one such instance. Oh the tangled web we weave when at first we practice to deceive. Cheney was behind this, his underlings wouldn't have the balls to put that kind of information out without his approval.
2007-02-02 10:40:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Any wound, whether stitched or no longer, heals greater valuable and swifter whilst that's lined with a sterile bandage. opposite to regularly occurring perception, leaving it uncovered to the air does no longer help. quite, it will develop the possibility of micro organism entering touch with the wound, which might only extend healing.
2016-11-24 19:54:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You better catch up on your reading. They already know who outed the lady. He has immunity from prosecution so he can nail a republican for not remembering things that happened long ago and didn't mean much anyway as they have determined a crime was never committed in the first place. Libby got nailed for not remembering about when he knew the agent worked for the CIA within about a two week space. Your tax dollars at work. The investigation has cost us millions and millions of dollars for a crime that they determined was never committed. Brilliant.
2007-02-02 10:38:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rich S 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Koalatcom. . . Scooter is the fall guy. Every politician has one or two in their grouping. Cheney is letting him take the fall to cover his @$$. Anyone with basic intelligence can see that.
As for the question at hand - I don't think anyone should trust a guy that shoots his friends in the face. . . Just one of those basic rules to live by.
2007-02-02 10:34:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Since Cheney DID NOT divulge the name (unless Richard Armitage is his alter ego), the answer has to be no.
BTW she was at Langley. Were she undercover, she would have been working for the wrong side.
She & her husband were also on the cover of Vogue magazine. Not exactly a low profile.
2007-02-02 10:29:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
5⤋
The so-called "cia agent" wasn't outed, she is a DC socialite, who's name was widely known. Cheney didn't expose her, please set your hatred for the Bush administration aside and use your head.
2007-02-02 10:33:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
No more than Berger. Pretty pathetic, huh? Doesn't it make you *proud*? Gack.
2007-02-02 10:31:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jadis 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
I don't trust any republicans, they will say or so anyhting to get power and money
2007-02-02 10:31:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋