If Bush didnt reacted to 9/11 what would you liberals say?

Question

You be complaning no matter what and this goes for the antiwar crowd to wouldnt you want your president to protect you if he does go and Iraq was helping terrorist is a fact they where giving safe haven to Osama bin ladin and other terrorist as well.

this is an if question like if a democrate was president during 9/11 and runing the war there world be no media bias.

I said Sadam was hiding Osama in his country. The Wmd's could have been moved to Iran or another country close by.

Yes I watch fox news and I watch nbc but compare them with what is going on with Iraq. One news gives us acually what happens there and what the troops thank. Nbc abc and other liberal media are bias they leave out the good news and only report destruction and death which to them sells not good news.

Answer 1

Is this before or after he was done reading the children's book in Florida?

Answer 2

Where do you get your facts? Faux News?

Bush did the right thing going after OBL. What went wrong was when he went into Iraq. Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11.

If supporting terrorists is a reason to invade, then why aren't we in Saudi Arabia? For every dollar that Iraq gave to the families of palenstinian suicide bombers, the Saudis gave five. Pakistan gave 3. Some of the smaller gulf states gave 2. And these are our "allies". So why haven't we invaded them?

Edit: Where do you get the idea that Saddam was hiding Osama? IT NEVER HAPPENED!! People like you scare me. And Saddam moved WMDs to Iran. A country that he has gone to war with and loved the idea of the U.S. overthrowing him. OBL WANTED to overthrow Saddam. Saddam was known to kill AQ operatives. Where do you get your ideas? Did your reality check bounce?

Answer 3

Osama and Saddam were enemies.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.

There are more terrorists in Iraq now than there were before Bush created them.

Answer 4

There was very few people who were against the Afghanistan War. But you are mistaken if you think Iraq was involved with 9/11 or Bin Laden. Saddam ran a secular state and he hated Bin Laden.

Answer 5

A president can in basic terms get stuff carried out if their occasion controls the two chambers of Congress. Obama has virtually no capacity appropriate now, he lost the abode in 2011. He in basic terms had finished capacity for 2 years. Bush, on the different hand, had finished capacity for 6 years, he did no longer lose Congress until 2007 (while the Democrats gained the two chambers). that is why Bush is a lot worse than Obama and all of us comprehend it. He had six years to wreck united statesa.. i do no longer think of Obama destroyed something, yet whether you do, he in basic terms had 2 years of it.

Answer 6

Hey stupid, no one is complaining about Bush's reaction to 9/11. Everyone is complaining about Bush's invasion of Iraq which has nothing to do with 9/11.

Answer 7

So you honestly think that his only choices were "don't react" or "take us into a war that's killed more Americans than 911 did, and ten times that in Iraquis, and refuse to listen to his people or his Congress?"

Sometimes eithr/or thinking can be troublesome.

Answer 8

Say Darn Boosh!

Answer 9

he didnt react to 911 fool

he sat in a class room reading MY PET GOAT
and his 1st order of business was
to FYL THE BEN LADEN FAMILY OUT of the country
whiule grounding everybody else

GET A CLUE repuke

Answer 10

i would have said "someone better tell him to put that children's book down, he's never gonna get past page 7"