The so-called "peace" prize has gone to terrorist Yasir Arafat and not to Ghandi who has been a greater inspiration for peace than anyone. It has gone to terrorist-loving Jimmy Carter and not to Ronald Reagan who dismantled mutually assured destruction. Calling it a peace prize is like nicknaming a tall guy shorty and a short guy stretch. Is the Norwegian parliament trying to say Al Gore is a terrorist?
2007-02-02 08:38:53 · 5 answers · asked by Benji 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If I did something worth a world recognized reward I would accept it. Just because some bad people have gotten it in the past doesn't take away from it's original intent.
2007-02-02 08:52:34 · answer #1 · answered by Mad Maxine 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I wouldn't accept it. I've done a lot of good and loved a lot, but I didn't earn a Peace Prize.
2007-02-02 16:47:08 · answer #2 · answered by Bud's Girl 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope Gore wins the Peace Prize. He deserves it for all he has done to promote awareness of global warming.
2007-02-02 16:44:34 · answer #3 · answered by itsdabigbadwolf 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Sophistry will only lead you to erroneous conclusions. And apparently it has in your case.
2007-02-03 05:48:46 · answer #4 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Idon't have to worry about that/.
2007-02-03 03:20:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋