http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070202/ap_on_he_me/cervical_cancer
And here I was thinking that conservatives are for "smaller" government.
I guess it's a "smaller" government meaning that it's OK to cut regulations and taxes for large corporations, but it's also OK to interfere in the private lives of citizens.
How hypocritical.
2007-02-02 08:14:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Conservatives are for a smaller central government with more power vested in the states. With that being said, this is a terrible law and it's a perfect example of politician selling out their constituency. Most conservatives in Texas do NOT support this law.
2007-02-02 08:18:12 · answer #1 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think it's pretty lousy too, but the truth is that the democratic party is doing this and without the permission of the parents. Young teens are not at risk for cancer later on in life unless they have relations with a man who can infect them with the virus. This is a medical finding. Not only that, they also said NOW, that it is not absolutely effective against that strain. However, it's the liberals who instituted his mandatory vaccine.
To me, it should be a parental choice, not the choice of government, so I agree.
And some other things the liberals have done is to arrange with the companies that write the new books for the elementary through high school are being told they must include the gay lifestyle so that children have their options open which way they would prefer to live; and that they want to point out all the successful homosexuals.
That's fine to let people have equal time regarding successes; however, the department of education did this act during the summer months last year, so that the parents would not pay any attention or be brought into the discussion. It think it should be up to the parents and not the department of education to teach these things. They underestimate the parental oversight and do not wish for them to have a say. I'm just wondering how many of you were aware of that.
2007-02-02 08:20:12 · answer #2 · answered by chole_24 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not an example of smaller government here. It wil only get worse. Just wait until we get a national bedtime.
2007-02-02 08:18:43 · answer #3 · answered by dwg1998red 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He may be a Republican, but that certainly is not a conservative position. I believe conservatives as a whole would disagree with Gov Perry.
2007-02-02 08:19:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who says Gov. Perry is a conservative?
2007-02-02 08:18:40 · answer #5 · answered by Jace 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Didn't you see Merck & Co. in that article? Someone is looking at major profits...can you say lobbyist-in-bed- with-the-governor five times fast?
2007-02-02 08:18:20 · answer #6 · answered by jimvalentinojr 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i think of, that is considerable " Love One" with out understanding IT , because of the fact the "yet another". yet, whilst the "yet another" isn't understanding Its considerable, Making Its considerable to "Love One", yet, that is stressful to "EXPORT" the affection with out the "IMPORT", might nicely be, consequently, It will become the considerable to Import and Export the affection. .
2016-11-02 03:54:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perry is only one in a few conservatives that agree with this plan. Mostly its liberals and the drug company that produces the vaccine.
Pink - I said Mostly didnt I?
2007-02-02 08:16:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
i think it is good to give little girls a vaccine that will prevent them from getting cancer. I don't see the problem
2007-02-02 08:37:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's what the republican party use to be about, but not anymore. There using every excuse in the book to invade our personal lives.
2007-02-02 08:18:40 · answer #10 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋