English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

First of all I want to state that I am a conservative. I'm not a Reagan conservative because I'm not that old, but I believe in everything exactly as they do with the exception of stem cell research. So here it goes:

I think that Bush has been way too soft of illegal immigration. He did offer an increase but the whole amnesty thing is way off course. Just because there is 30,000,000 illegals doesn't mean you do nothing. Personally I think that if they killed all of them problem solved. (I know that sounds extreme but seriously I can't believe that none of the people in Washington has the balls to fix the problem.)

Whew okay now that’s done I can finally say the good things.
Lower taxes thereby boosting the economy. Lowering the price on Oil(Anyone looked at the prices lately. Freakin' drones say stuff about him when it is bad but don't give him credit when it is do). At least tried to get rid of Social Security(That took balls). Took out AlQuida(Forgot how to spell it) in Afghanistan.

Now as to Iraq. This is why Iraq isn't a mistake, thats right you heard me. First of all we are there for a reason. Just because some of the WMDs were dismantled and some were missing doesn't mean that they weren't shipped out somewhere else. We even found around 500 tons of uranium, some of it enriched. Also remember the plans that they found in his palaces about how Sadam planned to take out the US. Back to the WMDs, even the pinkos favorite president Clinton said that Sadam had them and will use them. Not recently think back to his presidency. Past Bush's term. Also think for a second about who the insurgents are. The insurgents are being supported by foreign countries such as Iran. Now what does that tell you about the importance of Iraq if Iran is sending in cash, weapons, and people against us. Ask any general who isn't nurtured and he'll tell you that 3,000 of your people dead in a war AND occupation is really, really, really good. Sure it is sad but remember that over 1,000,000 people died in WWII in Russia. Also Sadam has sent out a terrorist cell to take out one of our Presidents. He tried to bomb and kill President Bush Sr.(Trying to take out a president is enough reason as any).

Anyway those are some of my reasons for and against Bush. The things for Bush are for all of those idiots out there who haven't put it together yet that he is a damn good president. I think that just because he isn't a good orator people think he is stupid. Some of the smartest people in history aren't good orators. The whole idea of having a eccentric genius isn't unheard of yet people consider a person who make a couple mispronunciations during his speeches as a sign of idiocy. If you ask me that is both prejudice and asinine. Anyway hurray for people that are for Bush, and boo-urns for invalids who are against Bush.

2007-02-02 08:50:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Didn't get BinLaden. 9/11 happened on his Watch. Undermined the constitution through use of signing statements. Didn't veto a single spending bill Except for stem cell research. Broke the FISA law. Created more government bureauracy with Department of Homeland security. Squandered the the budget surplus. Miserable response to Hurricane Katrina. Let oil companies slide on royality payments.

2007-02-02 08:18:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

In spite of the good economic performance, he has overseen one of the most unnecessary expansions of the Bureaucracy in US History with the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. In the six years of his presidency, spending has literally been out of control, though I attribute that as much to the 'incumbent security' earmark spending as much as to him. He has also accelerated the march toward global government and unnerving security with the "Real ID" and continued movement towards a national ID card. Those are things I consider to be poor judgment or performance from him.

2007-02-02 08:15:26 · answer #3 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 4 0

There is enough to fill a 20 pound book with small type without you-know-what, but exhibit 1 is the Katrina /New Orleans debacle and his "heck of a job" clown. "Nobody anticipated the breach of the levees" said Dumbya. And what money that WAS eventually allocated there he used as a political plum for his cronies to steal. BTW Dumbya was NEVER elected and therefore NOT president. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!

2007-02-02 08:38:32 · answer #4 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1 2

OK lets ignore the elephant and all its babies.
The roll back of environmental regulations when he took office.
The roll back of the rule that would have made airlines put on bulletproof doors to the cockpits that would have made 9/11 impossible.
Getting no child left behind passed, but unfunded, leaving the costs to the locality.
Hes always on vacation, not a good thing for a president.
No work on health care, no understanding of why the elderly need reasonable prescription prices, not a doughnut when they need more care.
He doesn't do anything at all for the working class or the middle class and acts as if business needs more help making profits than the people need to have access to hospitals and doctors.
No raise in minimum wage.
Still selling cheap grazing, lumber rights, and mineral rights to large corporations. Its our land, we should make them pay the proper amounts and end corporate welfare.
A very secretive government, one that smears its opponents and then says trust me.
Katrina. Katrina. Katrina
Others will have more, that's just the ones that stuck in my memory.

2007-02-02 08:18:07 · answer #5 · answered by justa 7 · 4 3

destructive Bush are you kidding, his wallet have become fatter via the minute whilst yours and ours have not got sufficient to get gas for those automobiles that we will finally end up pushing, if this "destructive Bush-ism" proceed. The fool isn't him yet people who think of that he's, he completely is familiar with of what all this unpopularity brings him and how lots he's making via the minute whilst we ask your self whether he's stupid or no longer. i does no longer say finished failure a minimum of for him and his relatives, as they are making lots funds, look into what they have you ever' ll comprehend what I mean. He actual does no longer supply a rattling approximately anybody' s opinion, Congressman coated. until now he is going down in history we are able to for particular flow down first, because of the fact we do not have his fortune. nonetheless sense sorry? awaken....sense sorry suitable to the folk death and suffering because of the fact his crap. Or do no longer waist it sluggish questioning approximately him.

2016-11-02 03:53:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not much. the economy is on the upswing still since 9-11. hes a bit slow, though, and some people dont like that he sticks to his christian roots.

2007-02-02 12:42:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Start with the largest debt increase in the history of the United States. http://www.uuforum.org/deficit.htm
Negotiating an open border with Mexico for his corporate friends, without consultation with Congress or the American people.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
Being the first President in history to not respond with aid for an American natural disaster: Katrina.
Dividing the population with remarks such as "you either with us or you are against us," suggesting that anyone who disagrees with his policy is giving comfort to the enemy, which now even includes members of his own party like Sen John Warner.
Need I go on?

2007-02-02 08:08:26 · answer #8 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 5 3

Not pardoning the two border guards, Ramos and Campeon, who shot an illegal alien drug dealer who was later found to have 762 lbs of pot in his van.

2007-02-02 08:09:53 · answer #9 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 5 0

that's like asking what did Nixon do wrong but don't mention Watergate. Iraq is the very cornerstone of GWB mountain of mistakes. even he admitted that the poor response to Katrina was because of the "fog of war".

2007-02-02 08:13:46 · answer #10 · answered by Alan S 7 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers