The movie wasnt good. Get the SAW movies. Much better.
2007-02-02 08:31:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Big Daddy Cool 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to agree with the majority and say that- the hills have eyes is crap and a waste of time. The older version is about the same and they made a number two (older version) and it has absolutely nothing to do with the first except for a few flashbacks. I say if you really want to watch it then rent it. Good luck
2007-02-02 08:18:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by jennifer A 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Try downloading again from http://www.meganova.org/details/456949.html
Always check the comments on the main seeding site. This one has 335 seeders at the moment. What exactly is the problem? Is it the format of the file you downloaded? A *.rar or *.avi
2007-02-02 08:16:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by sassenach 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I were you I would rent it, I wouldn't buy it, I was kind of disturbed by the movie itself and it seemed that it just didn't have too much of a point, just a lot of gore. It sounds like you want to see it and so you should definetely watch it, but don't waste your money buying it until you know if it's something that is worth owning. (I don't think that it's worth owning and my boyfriend does, the only way to know is to watch it)
2007-02-02 08:10:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mel 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe your not meant to drive through hills!!!
Keep trying you've got to watch it, I thought it was the best film I'd seen in 2006
2007-02-02 10:37:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by YeahYeahYeah 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try Blockbuster.
2007-02-02 08:09:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by b97st 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ooooooooooh! Spooky! I'd give it a miss, if I were you. It's rubbish anyway.
2007-02-02 08:06:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by kezza 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's rubbish - so maybe someone somewhere is trying to save you from it?
2007-02-02 08:11:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Satan is living in your DVD player and he doesnt want you to see it.
2007-02-02 08:08:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is dreadfully overrated
Rent "Pleasantville" instead
2007-02-02 08:05:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bob Danvers-Walker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋