Was he too lazy to go film the 1000s of polar bears that drown each day as the ice melts around them?
Did Clinton teach Gore that lying is ok?
2007-02-02 06:07:50 · 8 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Do you think Gore should have been honest enough to label the scene as "dramatization"?
2007-02-02 06:14:44 · update #1
Maybe because he forgot that polar bears can actually swim?
2007-02-02 06:12:46 · answer #1 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i'm hoping you have observed each and all the pictures of the polar bears are jut pictures of polar bears. they do no longer seem to be stranded or death, that's the form you manage your advice to make human beings think of they are drowning or stranded. A undergo on ice isn't stranded, that is resting or taking part in, that is going to easily leap off while that is waiting and swim returned. the single with the mummy and toddler is the single Al Gore utilized in his movie. the humorous area is the photographer that took the photograph knew they have been taking part in, yet Gore used it with somebody else's permission. The undergo popping out of the water is basically that, a undergo popping out of the water. regrettably for his or her reason the AGW crowd and media makes use of as lots propaganda and incorrect information as any defense force conflict attempt. that could be a shame they corrupt technology in this a manner. i'm hoping you may study something from this adventure.
2016-11-02 03:35:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess it would be hard to get a really accurate shot of a polar bear drowing bc you don't necessarily know when and where it's going to happen. Besides, that would probably have made the rating go up because it would be too disturbing for little kids.
Plus, I don't see how he's lying?
2007-02-02 06:11:24 · answer #3 · answered by Becky 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because any wildlife filmmaker will tell you it's almost impossible to capture many things that actually happen un-staged, in the wild. Like a shark feeding in the open ocean. It's never been captured on film.
They know it happens, have seen the evidence, but to expect a full film crew to be there at that precise moment is lunacy. Especially in the arctic.
Same goes for fatal shark attacks on humans. Never been actually filmed.
2007-02-02 06:19:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it's not feasible to go out and film drowning bears. Imagine the time and expense waiting for something to happen that may not happen on a film crew's watch.
(nice try)
2007-02-02 06:12:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It'd be too cruel to show a real polar bear drowning
2007-02-02 06:11:09 · answer #6 · answered by Henno93 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Al Gore (inventor of the internet) invented a new version of Paintshop Pro and wanted to show it off
2007-02-02 06:25:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because he still hasn't crawled out of the woodchuck hole he crawled into when President Bush kicked his butt in 2000.
2007-02-02 06:12:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋