Can you PROVE global climate change is man made?

Question

I said PROVE.

Answer 1

I doubt it. There were two very well regarded senior professors on the tv the other night that dispute the manmade global warming theory. they have written a book discussing and refuting point by point many assertions made by the politically correct community concerning this problem. One is that carbon dioxide is "not" a pollutant but a naturally occurring gas that is essential for life to exist. Plus, there is no correlation between carbon dioxide levels and global warming. The levels of this gas were much higher in the 1800's during a period of record cold around the world. As far as ocean levels rising, they have been doing that for the last 8000 years or so-up 400 feet since that time period. Also, some parts of the ice shelf at the poles are actually thickening while some are thinning. They claim global warming has to be dealt with in human terms and stated unequivocally that this is a natural phenomenon that have been going on for millions of years-Mt. St. Helens put more pollutants into the atmosphere then the human race has done during its entire existence. That last research has been published in many scientific journals. Their point was that while mankind must deal effectively with the changes, we shouldn't be going around beating each other up over it and continuously playing the blame game. We have a lot less control over the environment then we like to think we do.

Answer 2

No. You will never find a scientific study that clams that global warming is man made that does NOT have funding from global warming cooks.

The true fact of the matter is that global warming and global cooling trends happen on such a MASS scale and over such LONG periods of times that it's absolutely silly for us to think that something that we have done in a period of a couple hundred years affected the change.

Is the temperature rising? Yes. Are the polar ice caps melting? Yes. But they did the same thing in 1200 AD as well.

If I were you, I'd ask this question as well. We have proof that the polar ice caps are melting here due to global warming. We also have proof that the polar ice caps are melting on Mars. Are we then to assume that our increase in CO2 levels are affecting other planets as well???

Answer 3

Scientists can prove that global climate change is NOT man made. They can also, to what has been deemed a very high degree of certainty, theorize that ACCELERATED global climate change IS caused by the actions of humans.

I personally can not prove it as existing any more than you can prove that it does not exist. This is why we have experts who have worked for years in a given field to learn all they can about it.

Answer 4

No, I cannot. I can PROVE that the sun's energy output is increasing, apparently causing global warming.

However, humans are having an effect on the ecosystem that the public is being distracted into ignoring. We are deforesting, destroying the natural foliage growth that normally results from a warming trend. When the Earth gets warm, it turns into a greenhouse and the plant life flourishes, then the animal life flourishes. We are having some environmental effect by destroying the plant life.

Nature is doing the warming - and has been for about 12,000 years.

Answer 5

The so-observed as skeptics listed below are for the main section in denial with regard to the technology used to recent a case for human-appropriate climate substitute. organic cycles exist, little question approximately it. yet there is little room for doubt those final 5 years that human activities, extremely through fact the beginning up of the business Age and using fossil fuels, have speeded up and shifted organic cycles. do not enable everybody right here make it easier to be conscious of what's authentic or incorrect, what's or isn't going on. examine some books, assessment some web pages, verify out the technology, and you will start to advance a greater robust be conscious of-how of ways the organic cycles artwork and how human beings have prompted the cycles. It substitute into specifically while the politicians understood the value of inactiveness that issues incredibly began to ensue. Now maximum governments are in varied tiers of figuring out action plans, of engaged on mitigation, and version. it incredibly is our artwork for the foreseeable destiny. some web pages below that served me properly while i substitute into getting up and dealing on the subject count. i come across them to be respected components all. as far as books pass, I merely finished "the super Warming" by Brian Fagan. "warmth" by George Monbiot is next on my examining record, yet comes especially cautioned. "Deep financial equipment" or "warm, Flat and Crowded" can help upload a special attitude to the mixture, too.

Answer 6

Some is from man, some is from the sun. A combination of the two!

Answer 7

first off, its accelerated by humans, not man-made. you are adding words to make your point.

second, can you prove it isnt....can you prove God exists...can you prove creationism?

Answer 8

Can you prove that it's not?

Silly question - does anyone need absolute proof or just a preponderance of the evidence?

Answer 9

Actually, yes I can, however I do not believe that you would understand.

Answer 10

rush limpballs heated up sex clubs in the domican