English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Nazi Political Platfrom of the 1920's consisted of the following points;

- We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood.
- That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
- all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits
- We demand the nationalization of all trusts.
- We demand profit-sharing in large industries.
- We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions
- We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores

Doesn't these items sound like the liberals attacks on Wal-Mart, Haliburton, support of social security, national socialized health care, national socialized education, attack of Capitalism, windfall profits?

Todays liberals are a rehash of yesterdays Nazis

2007-02-02 04:46:43 · 21 answers · asked by radical4capitalism 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

21 answers

We can't forget one other very important fact about the Nazi's ideology that is an exact mirror image of the liberals in our society today: their pure and absolute faith in Darwinism.

One of Hitler's reasons and motivations behind his planned "Final Solution" of the Jews was that he considered them to be evolutionally inferior to the Arian race. Hitler was a firm believer in evolution and pushed off on his party as if it were fact. He mandated that it be taught to all children in schools as fact and that no other alternative was acceptable....

Sound familiar?

Hitler wasn't the only maniac who enforced this "kill the weak" method and ideal, in fact many of the worst people this world has ever seen were operating on some level under the assumption that evolution had made them superior, or that they were the the strongest and in this world it is "survival of the fittest." This essentially leads to the killing off of the weakest. One of America's most basic values is protecting those who haven't the means to protect themselves. So while conservatives are pushing this agenda liberals are pushing survival of the fittest.


By The Way:
The term neoconsvative refers to a Socialist Democrat who has turned to extreme conservatism. Essentially what it is refering to is democrats who have gone too far. I always get a kick out seeing undecated liberals use that word without knowing that they are insulting themselves. Just goes to show you what happens when you're brainwashed by the liberal education and media systems. It's sad really.

2007-02-02 05:01:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Not only are you exaggerating the points but you are either purposefully or unwittingly omitting the changes the Nazi party went through up until the 30s...

The early Nazi party had some resemblance to the democrats (that's how they earned the trust of the people) but later they became progressively more conservative and closer to the modern day republicans. They slowly took away the german people's freedoms in the interests of "national security", which included warrantless wiretapping of phones (indeed the phrase "If you have nothing to hide then you've nothing to fear" became popular in 1938 germany). Hitler slowly dismantled the democracy and replaced it with a dictatorship using the same reasoning and propaganda spin techniques that the republicans are using now.

I'm conservative, but I've denounced the republican party because they have genuinely lost sight of what it means to be conservative...

2007-02-02 04:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by Mike K 5 · 1 2

No, the comparisons that because Hitler or Nazis advocated certain things means people who advocate the same things are Nazis is an invalid argument.

I completely disagree with the liberals, but it is absolutely wrong to say they are Nazis, just because you've been able to find some common socialist beliefs between the two groups.

If they start calling people "sub-human" and put them in extermination camps, then you can call them "nazis".

2007-02-02 05:01:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I had gave "thumb up" to Thomas Hemsley even in spite of the undeniable fact that he additionally repeats the previous Stalin's cliche approximately national Socialist occasion of the German workers being on the main appropriate. yet historic previous of the occasion is presented wisely, whilst not something in that historic previous or everywhere else backs the "authentic" label. From Stalin's extreme-left ideological platform of Communism very virtually all of us substitute into on the main appropriate. Why repeat his propaganda 60 years after his dying without thinking logically for your self? in case you examine the call of the occasion, its expert application and its daily practices in the past and after it took means, you will see a thorough socialist occasion in the flesh. it fairly is to not say that Nazi have been sturdy. on the choice, it incredibly is approximately Socialism being undesirable in all applications - national or international.

2016-10-16 11:10:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Agreed, in part. But the biggest similarity is the Liberals' refusal to tolerate opposing opinion. The whole idea of "politically correct" smacks of Nazi intolerance. Another Nazi tactic used by the Left is the use of personal attacks and character assassination of those with opposing views. Just look at the Clarence Thomas hearings.

2007-02-02 04:57:02 · answer #5 · answered by bailey88 2 · 4 1

There are a lot of Nazi principles which can just as easily be applied to the conservatives in this country.
I agree with those who said thast a lot of liberals are commited Marxists. And why is it such a terrible thing to ensure all citizens of this country have equal opportunity to recieve basic needs and tools for future opportunities, such as health care and education?

2007-02-02 05:02:26 · answer #6 · answered by mzflyfemme 2 · 0 1

No. If anything they look, feel, and speak like committed Marxists. In fact, the Nazis were socialists. They only way that they may mirror Nazism, is the growing hatred of Jews and the seemingly "cooperation" with radical Islam. Not to mention the appeasement of terrorits.

2007-02-02 04:51:31 · answer #7 · answered by gman992 3 · 2 0

Yes. The National Socialist Workers Party of Germany has a strong similarity to the Socialists in America today. Let's not forget that American Socialists back then marched in the streets of our cities carrying the NAZI flag alongside the American flag, just as today's Socialists march in the streets carrying the UN flag alongside our flag.

They express their desire to reshape this nation under the rules and ideals of an outside party. They despise America's foundational principles and are at war against America to turn it into a Socialist State.

I was astonished at the loss of property rights two years ago.

2007-02-02 04:49:21 · answer #8 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 5 2

Zeig Heil

2007-02-02 04:50:56 · answer #9 · answered by crazyhorse19682003 3 · 1 0

You are wrong .
Neocns have a lot more commonality to Nazism.
Without going into details, look at the negative results of their power grab the past 12 years and you'd have a proof NEOCONS are far more destructive to the fabrics of our nation than any other group.

2007-02-02 05:01:14 · answer #10 · answered by WO LEE 4 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers