English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do cons actually pay attention to real scientific answers?

2007-02-02 03:51:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

6 answers

We refuse to admit that the sun does not warm the earth. Instead of calling it a sunburn when we stay out too long on a sunny day we should call it an SUV burn or a cow fart burn. I'll suggest the name change to AlGore first chance I get.

2007-02-05 03:31:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

For the same reason ignorant libs blame global warming on SUV's and gassy cows, instead of the Sun and natural cycles...

We all believe what we want to believe, chicken little...

2007-02-02 03:59:48 · answer #2 · answered by littleman77y 3 · 1 0

actual, it fairly is not purely deniers who have confidence interior the existence of worldwide warming as area of a organic cycle. all people who's nicely knowledgeable on the priority will understand that the climate modifications for countless motives. What some skeptics are claiming is that the fast warming we are -presently- seeing is a organic cycle wherein human beings play no area. The earth's climate is laid low with many complicated factors, and we do bypass by way of warmer and cooler ranges. even nonetheless, it is unquestionably standard in technology that Co2 is a greenhouse gasoline that helps to improve the temperature of the planet. it is likewise a reality that human activities are producing an limitless quantity of Co2 on a daily foundation. not basically this, however the present steep upward push interior the worldwide climate temperature can't be defined by way of organic cycles, and can be defined ok by way of the presence of all this extra Co2. i can confirm which you have many questions approximately worldwide warming, and rightly so, yet Yahoo solutions isn't the superb place to have them replied. Nor for that count, is the internet. the ideal ingredient to do is study a stable e book on the priority (and that i'm not speaking approximately those from marketplace-funded think of tanks etc). i desire to recommend "The tough instruction manual to climate exchange". This explains the priority in words that the undemanding guy or woman can understand, and as quickly as you have have been given to grips with the main undemanding suggestions in the back of it, you will see that ninety 9% of skeptical arguments are in reality not even appropriate, and are all approximately disproving claims that have been by no skill even made interior the 1st place (such using fact the priority of your question). in case you desire something much less long-winded then I recommend beginning with the two the movie "An Inconvenient reality" or the caricature e book "humorous climate", even in the event that they're going to basically supply you a quick assessment while in comparison with the tough instruction manual. stable success! Edit: After analyzing a number of your different solutions, I comprehend which you likely already knew that the international is going by way of organic temperature cycles. all the comparable i think of that it fairly is an significant enormous distinction to make. while some deniers declare that it fairly is all area of a organic cycle, one gets the impact that they think of the entire theory of guy-made worldwide warming assumes that the climate has by no skill warmed or cooled before present day society!

2016-12-13 07:05:15 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It all come down to money and education.Obviously SUVs and giant industrial smoke stacks as well as the cattle industry (which breed cattle in mass amounts) are looking out for their bottom line.Money is power but if it's not your lot in life to be a billionaire then you must educate yourself and be a leader and pass on that information.Yes the earth is and will always be going through changes but I'm sure that what we do to it matters as well.

2007-02-02 04:11:08 · answer #4 · answered by notebooky3 3 · 0 0

Because they dont want to piss the SUV people off. If youre talking about politics its all a game and popularity contest. Thye dont want to lose support from those SUV people. This morning I was watching the news and it looked like they were finally shifting the blame to cars and factories. Bout damn time too.

2007-02-02 04:02:33 · answer #5 · answered by Becca 2 · 0 1

Because cons want to preserve the free market ... and libs want to destroy it.

2007-02-05 21:16:35 · answer #6 · answered by DJForce 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers