Apparently, scientists are trying to tell us that global warming is caused by humans. But as many non-scientists will tell you, climate change it a natural cycle that humans have no affect over. So why are scientists pushing this liberal scare tactic? Do scientists hate SUVs?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070202/ap_on_sc/france_climate_change;_ylt=AsWgREZ6Ede5H.QH.4vGFwPMWM0F;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MzV0MTdmBHNlYwM3NTM-
Or could it be that humans are affecting global warming and the people who refuse to accept this don't know what they are talking about?
2007-02-02 03:49:04 · 19 answers · asked by Take it from Toby 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would rather believe the scientists over anyone. But I like living in reality, unlike most republicans.
2007-02-02 03:53:02 · answer #1 · answered by paul 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
If your not a scientist, you don't know what your talking about.
Regular people will apply basic ideas to their assumption that global warming is cyclical.
But remember.. yahoo news is a democratic media source... they probably didnt tell you the # of scientists that support the weather cycle theory...
I do believe some do.
One flaw with applying science to the global warming thing is the fact that our weather records only go back to the early 1900's...
Before then, we never officially recorded weather....
so many things, scientists will say are new and whatever... but, due to our lack of information on the subject, we dont know what happened from 8000 B.C. to 1900 A.C....
It's a tricky thing to understand. But with Bush's new plan to lower oil intake by 20%, and increase our need for hydrogen cars... we should eliminate a HUGE chunk of the co2 the U.S. produces...
Also, we should replace A/C's with newer, more technological air-cooling devices.
An A/C, in one day, makes enough co2 to fill hour house 4 times.
now think of how much that is
assuming you use your a/c every other day in the summer.
and assuming 75% of the american population owns an A/C
and assuming 35% of the american population own more then one.
THATS A LOT OF FRIGGEN CO2...
lets take the safe route...
reduce the number of gas cars by 1/2.
replace a/c's with a thing that makes less co2/no co2...
and that'll remove a huge chunk of the co2 we produce as a country.
2007-02-02 04:08:59 · answer #2 · answered by Corey 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because of the fact colleges are pushing a liberal schedule. historic past is a physically powerful occasion. speaking approximately how Jefferson grew to become right into a slave proprietor quite of the data that he banned importation of slaves as president, wrote freedom for all slaves into the unique DOI and did greater to end slavery than somebody that ever lived. additionally, center matters like math and analyzing are some distance much less substantial than they was. they have been replaced with intercourse ed, coaching approximately international warming/recycling and different liberal reasons. maximum pupils graduating severe college on the instant won't have the ability to verify on a severe college point. countless won't have the ability to verify in any respect. maximum of those human beings vote democrat too.
2016-11-24 19:14:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's your second point that is the correct one.
By the way many scientists have been warning about global warming since the mid seventies, incidentally the one book I read on it in 1980 has been 100% spot on with it's predictions, none of them political. Funny how that book criticized the Carter administration of not doing enough to start the US on a path to avoid some of the problems we have now.
2007-02-02 03:59:31 · answer #4 · answered by vertical732 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
As someone in the research field, I know for a fact that the people funding these studies have an agenda and specifically ask us scientists to find any possible evidence to support thier agenda, or else the funding gets cut off. Scientists are forced into the position of "proving" the agenda of the funding source provider. The conclusions of the studies are already made before the "study" even takes place.
2007-02-02 03:59:52 · answer #5 · answered by dr_tom_cruise_md 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Scientists are mostly liberals so they are part of the problem.
Want to stop Global Warming? Kill all of the cows, that will take care of it. They produce more greenhouse gasses than any man has ever done.
Problems with Global Warming:
Temperature data prior to 1890 based on tree rings.
Graph shows data from the Northern Hemisphere ONLY.
Trends are in statistical norms, IE we are due for a warm spell.
CO2 levels are slightly above normal levels (280's compared to today's levels)
Accurate solar data only goes back 30 years.
Martian ice caps are melting yet not mentioned.
Kyoto:
Exemptions for 1/3 of the people on the planet. (China, India)
Where was man when CO2 levels were 100 to 1000 times higher than they are today? Not even alive......
2007-02-02 04:12:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
The world is not just US. Dubya and US are two different things.
Not Dubyan= Liberal. Do you think people in all the planet have the same point of view? What's next? Science books must be burned? The world is flat and it's the center of the solar system?
2007-02-02 04:26:31 · answer #7 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny about that story, there were only "dozens" of scientists and lots of bureaucrats, too, at that meeting, per another story yesterday. Anybody want to bet that only scientists who supported the man-made global warming theory were invited, and no dissenting scientists were there?
Unfortunately for you, facts don't support your beliefs about who disagrees with the global warming hysteria. Attached is a letter from 60 accredited experts and scientists who say man-made global warming is not supported by the evidence.
It's too bad you're so wedded to your belief that you cannot accept that other people disagree with you for very rational reasons, and you feel you must insult and smear them for not kneeling before your "gods".
2007-02-02 04:13:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
When you say "liberal agenda" do you mean the reality of global warming? I thought so ...
YES. Humans are the cause. Industry is going to kill this world. Many people are stupid and ignorant and they should be the first to go.
2007-02-02 04:23:24 · answer #9 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Scientists know there stuff, although they could be theorys, Our Planet could be in jeopardy if nothing is done to stop polluting the air, the ozone is getting hotter and hotter, our moon is moving away from our planet. Weather is so bizzare it's only gonna get worse. We can do things to help our planet like go green use wind & hydro power. I mean some things we can't stop from happening but we can do our share to limit the bad outcomes that we might face in the distant future.
2007-02-02 04:00:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Gloabl warming exists and the ONLY people in denial are big business and the few unethical scientists they try to buy off. Any one who doesn't get it by now is either in deep denial or intellectually unable to grasp simple truth, and it's not a "Liberal Agenda" it's called prudence something some people lack a great deal of
2007-02-02 03:56:52 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋