He's got my vote
2007-02-02 03:44:59 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Was it acting? If it was, he is a fraud - if it isn't, it doesn't deserve an oscar.
2007-02-02 03:47:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
on an identical time as the media is confident guy is the reason in the back of worldwide warming there is information that the earth is going by way of cycles of heating and cooling. most of the final million years ice coated a good number of the earth basically warming up approximately 15000 years in the past. From 800 to 1300 the climate became into very heat and guy thrived, even interior the "dark a while". beginning in 1350 issues cooled off straight away for the subsequent 500 years maximum of that have been depressing. nutrition shortages brought about famines, storms killed thousands. In 1850 the cooling became into over and because then issues have warmed up somewhat and guy has thrived back even surviving a flu pandemic in 1918 and 1919 that killed tens of millions of human beings. it fairly is a reality that the earth warms and cools and blaming it on mankind isn't a actuality.
2016-12-13 07:05:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Oscars for best documentary are awarded based upon the overall merits of the film--not just in the way it was made, but in its effect--then it should. It has made a profound impact on people, and created a desperately needed awareness among Americans of a looming global problem that threatens to dwarf all others. He's got my vote, my thanks, and my admiration.
2007-02-02 03:58:59 · answer #3 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore will not win an Oscar.
The filmmakers that turned his "Talk" as he calls it in the film will.
Anybody who hasn't seen it, can not have any valid opinion on it. Not to mention that anybody who doesn't know that global warming is the biggest global issue facing us right now has their head in the sand.
2007-02-02 03:54:57 · answer #4 · answered by vertical732 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Gore might well win a Nobel Peace Prize, which is more important.
2007-02-02 04:18:24 · answer #5 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should for best documentary
I cant imagine Bush even trying to pronounce most of any of the dialog. It was thoughtful and lucid and anyone that denies Global warming has to see it just so they could try to counter the argument, unless they are an ignoramus who wishes to remain so.
2007-02-02 04:11:46 · answer #6 · answered by gdeach 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably but only because Hollywood is full of liberals. His movie is a work of pure fiction.
2007-02-02 03:50:32 · answer #7 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the Science Fiction category? Because it certainly isn't FACT!
2007-02-02 03:52:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Is there really any doubt? As long as the far-left Liberals control Hollywood.....this is a sure thing!
2007-02-02 03:53:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Maybe. Hollywood will fawn all over it just like they did with Micheal Moore's movie.
And look where it got him...
2007-02-02 03:53:28 · answer #10 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋