He's afraid he will say something stupid and give away our attack plans.
2007-02-02 02:29:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kwan Kong 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
We are attempting to destabilize Iran not strengthen them. I suppose he should do what Clinton did with North Korea? There is no talking to these terrorist supporting extremists.
Saddam paid every family of a suicide bomber $10,000. Though he wasn't the largest supporter of terrorism he certainly backed them.
He was the easiest target to beat and save American lives by making Iraq the catalyst for political change throughout the Middle East.
A free Iraq with all Iraqi citizens receiving their fare share of oil revenue checks (as in Kuwait) will destabilize the Iranian government causing a thereat from within their own country.
Destabilizing Iran automatically weakens the foundation of the Syrian government.
These are the 2 largest contributors to terrorists. This has been the strategy from day one but the current administration cannot come right out and speak these words.
This will cause the monies flowing like a river to Al-Quaeda, Hezbollah, and Ham mas to be reduced to a dripping faucet.
The war in Iraq has been about undermining the terrorist supporting countries of the entire Middle East and is a logical step to end the source of money to terrorist organizations.
Once again...a free Iraq is their worst nightmare.
God Bless
2007-02-02 10:43:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You can't honestly be that stupid. Have you ever listend to that Freaked out Nut job over there in Iran? He's hell bent on WW3. He's made the statement on more than one occasion that the end is near for Israel and the USA. Only an Idiot would attempt to negotiate with that Nut. He wanst Nukes we should give him Nukes Air Mail that explode on Impact.
2007-02-02 10:51:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Kim Jong II has learned his behavior from his faher before him. He rattles his sabre and makes lots of noise but this is just how he gets what he needs for N. Korea. Ahmadinejad and the Iranian Ayatollas are deadly serious in their intent. You can't sit down and negotiate with terrorists. In fact, there is no sense in even staring a dialog.
2007-02-02 10:28:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by suburbandude 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why talk to someone who only wants to destroy the USA. Sounds like you would be more at home in Iran.
2007-02-02 10:26:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by slodana2003 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah South Korea, a free and democratic nation.
2007-02-02 10:20:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by J S 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Paul it has nothing to do with fear. It is all about status! Nuclear weapons are also about status. If these people were sane, it would be obvious today, one can never use these weapons.
2007-02-02 10:23:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
we don't have military bases in iran.
2007-02-02 11:44:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by alex l 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's because he doesn't know Persian so he can't talk to them. !!! looool
2007-02-02 19:38:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chev Chelios 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
he doesn't want to talk because he wants to invade them also. They have oil, North Korea doesn't.
2007-02-02 10:20:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by paul 5
·
0⤊
4⤋