I don't mean those in their 60's and 70's, but the very old. They've paid taxes all their lives and what money they have will be eaten up in medical bills and self care. Wouldn't it be better to let them use their money for their own living expenses than making them pay taxes to support schools and gov't programs?
I think that anyone who makes it to 90 should be exempt from all taxes. They are at a point in their life that any savings they have should be available to them for their own care. If they earn anything it's interest on savings. Why tax that?????
2007-02-02
02:13:37
·
5 answers
·
asked by
momwithabat
6
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ Other - Taxes
Would like to get your feedback on this.
2007-02-02
02:14:29 ·
update #1
Elderly who did make a conscious effort to prepare for their later life by saving their whole working lives are taxed on the interest earned. IRA's weren't around in the 40's and 50's. People saved on their own.
Have you priced a month in an assisted living or nursing home? At $4,000\$-5, 000 a month, their savings wont last long. Do you have any idea what this does to an individual who has spent their whole life saving to self sufficient in their old age? They don't WANT to be a burden on society.
2007-02-02
02:28:52 ·
update #2
My 97 yr old mom has paid taxes EVERY year. Does she have a lot of money? No, one broken hip, a couple years in a nursing home and she is broke. The gov't should let her keep her interest income. She's paid her share over the years. That's all I'm saying.
2007-02-02
02:34:02 ·
update #3
for boinga
Who do you think paid to build the schools you went to? Who paid for the roads you learned to drive on? Would you rather the gov't sent you a bill for what you have already taken advantage of through gov't appropriations?
2007-02-02
03:40:20 ·
update #4