I believe the word "grouped" was used correctly. But I don't like the way "fundings' business functions" sounds like. Maybe use business function fundings? If I knew more about what you're talking about maybe I could suggest different words... But I don't know what fundings' business functions are...
: )
2007-02-02 02:14:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by ytmaya 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the document, the fundings' business functions have been utilised to group the findings into different sections.
2007-02-02 02:18:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Great Eskape 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's very awkward and round the corner . . . .
How about "In the document, the sections represent groupings of business functions for the fund."
I am assuming you meant "Find" vs. "fund.
If you didn't, then "Inthe document the sections are grouped by the business functions uncovered in the study."
2007-02-02 05:48:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by kramerdnewf 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will group my findings into different sections for the business functions.
2007-02-02 02:27:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lindsay Jane 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The conclusions from this document are indexed by the various business functions.
2007-02-02 02:15:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by gorgeousfluffpot 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would change "the findings are" to "the findings have been" I feel it makes the sentence flow better. Without knowing the full subject matter though, I would not change the sentence at all.
2007-02-02 02:17:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by major b 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
"In the document the findings are CATEGORISED into different section sby the fundings' business fuctions"
2007-02-02 02:16:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
fundings could be changed to findings to me makes more sense.
2007-02-02 05:03:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Scott 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Instead of 'grouped', you could use the word 'categorised'.
2007-02-02 02:39:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps, "arranged"
2007-02-02 02:15:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋