English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

than being a Blame America First Bedwetting Liberal Democrat who is (1) anti-War against genocidal despots; (2) hates the twice elected President of the United States; and (3) thinks that black Americans are "House N*ggers" if we don't agree with the Liberals' ultimate Communist agenda?

2007-02-02 00:42:16 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

TYPICAL LIBERAL DEMOCRAT RACISM BY "WHITE.SAL". I EXPECTED IT.

2007-02-02 00:52:30 · update #1

26 answers

I think all groups have good points..

I however get forced at work to listen to Rush L. I can seriously say.. that republicans if judged by that radio talk program, are very narrow minded.. and repetitious. The thought that Rush a man who is so addicted to Oxycotin Could be held with such high popularity amongst Republicans... Makes me wonder...

Thanks God I can think for myself and just simply vote for whom I believe is the better choice.. Election time.. I believe is the one time that makes all americans Hateful of eachother and our differences...

2007-02-02 00:57:39 · answer #1 · answered by GirlWithQuestions 4 · 5 2

1. I'm a proud liberal, though I haven't wet the bed since I was a tyke, thank you very much. Also, I'm in favor of waging war on genocidal despots only when they pose a direct threat to the US. By the way, in case you've forgotten, it was Osama bin Laden, not Saddam Hussein, who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. By the way, where the hell is Osama? It's already been 5 YEARS since the attacks, and he STILL hasn't been caught! I guess it's more important to invade a country that has one of the largest oil reserves in the world than it is to capture a man who was responsible for the deaths of 3,000 people. I'm sure glad to see the Republicans have their priorities straight!

2. Bushy Boy was NOT twice elected. In case you've forgotten, he was put in the White House by his father's Supreme Court buddies back in 2000. By the way, that was after they decided not to do a recount in the Florida counties that just happened to have a predominantly black and Democratic population. Mere coincidence? I doubt it!

3. Also, in case you didn't know, there is a HUGE difference between communism and liberalism. And not only that, but I've never heard any white liberals refer to black conservatives as "house n*ggers", so please don't put words into our mouths. Plus, you may find this hard to believe, but I don't automatically assume that all blacks share the same political views. After all, I make it a point to try not to dub all members of a group the same.

2007-02-02 01:25:06 · answer #2 · answered by tangerine 7 · 1 2

I am a conservative, but I have to disagree with some of your points. There are definitely liberals who fit the mold you describe, but they are the extremists and do not represent the mainstream in any fashion. Contrary to the bomb throwing antics favored on Yahoo Answers, I know many liberals who are thoughtful intelligent people and do not fit this mold. They don't agree with the President but do not make the outrageous statements mired in hatred and lack of critical examination of fact. They don't agree with the war, but believe we must finish what we have begun. Where most Liberals do fit your contentions is in their opinion regarding blacks in our society. They have an almost religious devotion to the welfare state. I believe most think they are helping and have no racial motives, but this is the greatest disservice fostered on the black community since slavery ended. We should help people who need, but we should not have created lifetime entitlements. In order for people to excel they must be challenged and expected to stand on their own. Liberals take the opposite approach too often, which is you can't help yourself so we will do it for you, or that you are only down because some other conspiracy is keeping you there. On the plus side though it does appear that many in our black communities are seeing through rhetoric and are beginning to take their proper place in our society. I say more power to them and welcome to the wider world of self reliance.

2007-02-02 01:03:42 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan 7 · 3 0

the financial recuperate is stable - it took a whilst to teach it around, tremendously with the GOP obstructing each little thing. smart wellness care is a plus. The deficit is shrinking. gas fees have leveled out and the scandals, tremendously the GOP synthetic Benghazi disaster is pretend. additionally, we glance at what the GOP has grew to become into and we thank God a Democrat sits interior the White abode and not Romney or any of the different twits of the suited Wing.

2016-11-02 03:08:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The simple answer is yes.

A real liberal Democrat wouldn't be fond of any of the last three twice elected presidents. And the bedwetting thing is called water sports.

I especially liked the answer. Kill them all, they are all traitors. Let me just add that killing 50% of the US population would only embolden the enemy. But hey, after depopulating the urban centers, we could return to being a nation of yeoman farmers and then really be on a square footing with the terrorists.

2007-02-02 00:58:29 · answer #5 · answered by Jeremy B 2 · 2 4

Adressed your anger issues in an earlier answer to another qeustion.

Will now adress this. Furious George/The decider was not elected twice. Will give you the second one. He had that awesome 51% mandate. First one-he lost. Look it up. Al Gore got more votes. Bush won with the help of the outdated Electorial College.

2007-02-02 00:52:19 · answer #6 · answered by Jeffrey H 2 · 5 2

Communist? No, if anything the Republicans are communist, they are the ones who protect industries (who pay them too) from advancements that would put them out of business, but would be good for the rest of us, that's communism, not capitalism, with the government being far too involved. Your use of labels to stereotype us liberals is very good, maybe you should go into advertising, or are you really Karl rove? this seems like a tactic that a hole would use.

2007-02-02 00:48:40 · answer #7 · answered by Jessy 4 · 6 3

I think you're beyond rational discourse at this point in your life. If I stripped all the slanted, vitriol from your question, there'd be nothing left but a few conjunctions and a preposition.

Go find your peace, you're not finding nor making it here.

2007-02-02 01:06:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Liberal Democrats will destroy this country because they are soft on national security by affording more rights to the terrorists, by not wanting to confront the terrorists and by befriending dictators like Fidel Castro and Chavez. they argue about individual rights and freedoms but fail to see the abuses committed by this dictators. In Cuba a citizen is not allowed access to the Internet for example...plus they have no rights.

2007-02-02 01:06:31 · answer #9 · answered by mario 2 · 1 4

You've got serious mental problems. So, nobody is allowed to think any way other than how you dictate? Yes, you love freedom! What a wonderful American you are. Congrats!

2007-02-02 00:52:54 · answer #10 · answered by melouofs 7 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers