English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After such a huge UK public response why not keep it going elsewhere ! ?

>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6323739.stm

Got your attention now?? Thought so ! Action !!!

2007-02-02 00:31:56 · 15 answers · asked by Hugh Jarce 1 in News & Events Current Events

15 answers

Seems most people have misunderstood what you are trying to say.
I agree with you, if the public & media can create such an outcry & furore over something as inconsequential as Big Brother then why doesn't it happen when something DOES matter?
Like Gary Glitter (a convicted peodophile) being given early release from prison. Surely this is a more shocking, disturbing and unacceptable matter of public interest than a bunch of unpleasant girls bitching on TV about an Indian woman who has 100 times more class than them anyway.
The only way the laws regarding peodophiles will get tougher is if the public make their voices heard.
We all think "this would never happen to my child" but what if it did? I'd want someone to spend more than a couple of years in prison if they hurt my child. Infact, prison would be too good for them!

2007-02-02 03:10:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Mate,these utter braindead idiots cannot see what you mean. I have read and admired your other postings for today. I support your campaign ideas TOTALLY. You will never get the British public out of their plastic "celeb" world. It is all they have and all they want to know ! The dumbing down of Britain by the Govt. has worked a treat. Just look how weak a response you have to your other anti paedophile postings. THEY DON"T CARE Man ! Alcohol,football,slobbing in front of a T.V. = your everyday fat,drab
* a. s. s. h. o. l. e * British. But well done and I am right with you on the subject which you are trying? to raise awareness about . Try taking it elsewhere . This is a playground for sad empty heads. ! Good Luck !!

2007-02-02 09:31:42 · answer #2 · answered by Thom Jo D 1 · 1 0

What I saw on the tv was a bunch of girls bullying another - I heard a few comments but nothing I thought was 'way over the top'. So bloody what if Jade said Shilpa Popadom, big frigging deal, so what if Jo asked if Indians are skinny because they can't cook, what's wrong with that? Ficking pain in the a.r.s.e all this is. They could have said a lot worse than that if they WERE racists believe me and I should know - I've lived with it all my blinking life.

It's at the stage now where people can't even bloody open their mouths without someone jumping up and down pulling their hair out and calling the politically correct police. Enough already. or am I being racist now.

2007-02-02 09:17:01 · answer #3 · answered by Curious39 6 · 3 3

The REAL racism is the super, focussed attention Shilpa's treatment and the non-existant attetention of Jackson's 'White Trash' remarks

2007-02-02 09:43:22 · answer #4 · answered by Andrew Turner 1 · 1 2

oh now there's an ugly thought .... Gary Glitter and Jade Goody ....
I guess he's going to be our problem again

2007-02-02 09:27:47 · answer #5 · answered by Eden* 7 · 0 0

This issue should NOT be swept under the carpet and forgot.Yes she needs help? but will she learn from her big mouth outrages? I don"t think so

2007-02-02 08:55:41 · answer #6 · answered by newciderman 6 · 2 1

give the girl a break.

yes she was silly and insensitive but doesn't deserve all of the fallout shes got, even shilpa has said that

stop already

2007-02-02 08:43:17 · answer #7 · answered by lola 5 · 0 3

Let's just leave it now for once and for all. It was a really nasty thing to have done, but it's time to let things go.

2007-02-02 09:04:07 · answer #8 · answered by Alison of the Shire 4 · 0 3

Aren't you Brits tired of it already

2007-02-02 10:08:03 · answer #9 · answered by quilm 3 · 0 2

She may have been a nasty bully but don't you think the media and everyone else who complains about her are bullies too?? !

2007-02-02 08:45:17 · answer #10 · answered by sonj75 2 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers