Terrorists, Rapists and paedophiles should be jailed for a min of 50 years ? agree or not?

Answer 1

Not. We should not put a limit on it, they should rot in jail forever. To think we could rehabilitate these people is insane.

Answer 2

if paedophiles have been caught red handed and there is sufficient evidence then a hanging would serfice , rapists should be given on circumstance ,like a 18 yera old should get 5 years , 30 year old 30 years and any repeat offender should be hanged but you have to remember a country that doesnt look at the evidence properly and there eeds to be enough evidence other wise innocent people would be locked up forever or killed . as for terrorists people like Bliar , dubya and the rest need locking up for the rest of there days to think about what they have done.

if it were so simple you wouldnt need to write this question it would be sorted , you or i would change our opinions if we were falsly accused , i beleive there should be tougher sentenes as i see what we have today is crime breeding a vicous circle that will never get any better .

Answer 3

I dont think that terrorists should be in the same category as the other 2. They are not carrying out sexually motivated predatory crimes. I think that the beasts should be exiled, or at least castrated ( and i dont mean with tablets) they should not be given a chance to re-offend which statistics show they WILL!!! the ones that dont are just cleverer as you cannot cure sickness of that sort!!

Minimum of 50 years is a good start tho

Answer 4

Not a bad idea, but why should the honest, hard-working American taxpayers shell out to incarcerate these menaces to society for 50 years in what amounts to a Hilton with bars? Why not go the inexpensive route and hang them from the nearest tree? That only costs about $5.00 for a hunk of rope...

Answer 5

I think we should go back to the "eye for an eye" for certain people but not for all cases, I remember reading an article about too teens where dating one was 18 the other was 16 they had sex and the 18 year old was sentenced and had to register. They went to the same high school one was a senior the other was a sophomore, that’s just not right, but for other cases eye for an eye.

Answer 6

All criminals should be sentanced according to their crimes. The sentance should have 2 elements to it, an element of punishment and an element of rehabilitation.

They should be let out of prison when they have done their punishment and have been rehabilitated so that they dont do that crime again. If they are let out and they repeat their crime then the prison sentance hasnt worked.

Its up to us to decide how much punishement to gice someone - 50 years however seams a bit long, you are saying that they should die in jail.

It should be up to prisonpsychologists to asses whether they are likely to re-offend and if they are, they shouldnt be allowed out and if they arent then let them out as soon as they have finished their punishemnt


Or thats what I think

Answer 7

i've got confidence it somewhat is extra significant to look for a answer to a topic than to assign blame and insist punishment previously the data are popular. In Chicago, there became right into a Cardinal who became into wrongly accused of incorrect doing. After some years, and much suffering and injury to the church, the accuser finally recanted and admitted that he had made up the incident. until eventually there is the thank you to guard monks from fake witnesses, i think of each and each case might desire to be examined one at a time, and the belief of "harmless until eventually proved in charge" might desire to be maintained. i'm no longer a member of the Catholic church, yet i might recommend that Catholics evaluate no longer in basic terms the harm to babies in each and each case, yet in addition the wear and tear to the priest and to their church and to Christianity as an entire. i've got confidence the church, as a conventional physique, is extra appropriate located to handle the themes and has aspects to handle people who might desire to in no way be in value of babies. A monastic life may well be a extra appropriate answer than penitentiary now and back. I additionally think of the Pope merits the help and help of his flock in coping with this and different issues.

Answer 8

disagree, my friend is a paedophile, his crime was to pick up a girl in a nightclub and sleep with her, her parents reported him to police and that's when he found out she was 15, he got 9 months for it and put on the register, i don't think 50yrs would be right for him, if anything the girl should hve been prosecuted for giving false information and the nightclub for allowing under age drinkers, she obviously looked over 18 to my friend and with getting passed door staff he assumed she was.

Answer 9

Why bother with jail? Just fly `em out over The North Sea and drop `em in it!

Answer 10

First you need to make sure all evidence makes it to the court room.No Suppression of Evidence,EVER!
Bad crimes,life and a day,with Hard Labor.Like digging a huge ditch at our south border.Get something out of them before they die and not just support them.