which is a better medium,print media or television?

Answer 1

That depends on what you are trying to communicate and your audience. If it is something small and inexpensive like a competition for a local club or a meeting. Print can work much better. For larger audiences, television may provide a better marketing tool. Also, don't forget about radio. Sometimes it can be better than both. It's cheap, people listen to it on the way to work, and sometimes they listen to it at work or on their free time.

Answer 2

What a loaded question, but I have wondered the same thing these last couple of months.

I believe television satisfies our want for instant content, but often times lacks in substance in the form of 30 second debates and does not always focuse on issues that I believe are central to the rebuilding of an American Democracy. I am not an expert in the field of journalism, but I no longer consider Fox and CNN, etc.
to be news worthy. And they certainly did not seem neutral in their stance when the US invaded Afganistan and Iraq. I do however enjoy watching some Japanese News (which has its own spin on things) and the BBC.

Therefor I will have to place my vote for print media, where issues are usally discussed at legnth. For all practicaly purposes, I also consider the Internet to be a sub-set of print media. The only print media I consume is BBC On-line, the French 24 news, the Japan Times and ASAHI Shinbun, and the New York Times. I also visit a few blogs now and then.

Answer 3

television for me maybe its grandiose voyeurism who knows

Answer 4

I prefer oils.