...in the process, you set research for all other known diseases back 15 years, would you do so?
2007-02-01 23:58:17 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
si......i would....cancer BLOWS!!! trust me
2007-02-02 00:00:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I DO have the ability but no one will listen. I healed myself from chronic illness by eliminating processed foods and artificial things from my diet. No one wants to wrap their brain around the fact that toxins in food are the main cause of most illnesses to begin with!
2007-02-02 08:02:00 · answer #2 · answered by beebs 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Stupidity.
2007-02-02 08:05:18 · answer #3 · answered by Max Power 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where do you come up with this stuff?!! I'd say no because a lot of people will die in those 15yrs if you put back their research.
2007-02-02 08:01:55 · answer #4 · answered by Moon Man 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, there's not one disease that kills more than every other one, not worth it, if i had to it would of coarse be cancer, but no, I wouldn't want to risk losing all those others for a simple drug that hasn't been discovered yet.
2007-02-02 08:03:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's really hard to say but no.
***Beebs you're brilliant. I've been telling people that forever and no one will listen!
2007-02-02 08:10:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That idea sounds suspicious. I don't like it.
2007-02-02 08:15:40 · answer #7 · answered by Rachel 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
chronic stupidity
2007-02-02 08:04:31 · answer #8 · answered by BajaRick 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes......
Cancers....
Namely leukaemia...
In young babies....( they derserve a fighting chance )
2007-02-02 08:02:32 · answer #9 · answered by yahoo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i would
2007-02-02 08:07:19 · answer #10 · answered by destiny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no...that would cost too many lives.
2007-02-02 08:03:58 · answer #11 · answered by running2adream 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋