String theory predicted ten dimensions, but as it got more and more complicated (five theories instead of one), it became clear that what was really need to unify them was eleven dimensions, which had been predicted by another theory, quantum gravity. However, now that both have evolved into M-Theory, that brings me to a basic unanswered question. Is M-Theory really a "unified field theory?" Does it bring gravity into the equation by invoking that extra dimension? If so, how does it unify the electroweak, strong and electromagnetic forces with gravity? I've never heard a simple explanation that didn't require a Ph.D. in Physics.
2007-02-01 23:34:05 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
That's because a simple explanation doesn't exist. Even a complicated explanation doesn't exist, because there is as yet no grand unification theory that brings together the four (or three) fundamental interactions. Such a discovery would arguably be the most important development in the history of science; it would be talked about everywhere. It hasn't happened yet.
Take a look at M-theory and GUT on Wikipedia.
2007-02-01 23:49:21 · answer #1 · answered by Ben C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you may substitute your working definition of concept. whilst there's a trouble-free expression that an concept is a properly-examined hypothesis, it incredibly is an oversimplification. A hypothesis may be extremely basic: it could expected that oil droplets will fall at a terminal speed it incredibly is proportional to their radius squared (portion of the Millikan oil drop test). besides the reality that challenge to finding out, some basic hypotheses could characterised as regulations or suggestions, yet not as an concept. A concept has a 2nd significant ingredient: it incredibly is overarching. Newton's theories appropriate the falling of gadgets to the action of celestial bodies with a rigidity that doesn't be promptly measured for a century (Cavendish test). in spite of the experimental affirmation, the thought substitute into replaced by prevalent relativity, so theories are in basic terms provisional--a greater robust variety can supersede them. the 1st try of any concept is its inner congruence. If the thought is inconsistent with nature, it incredibly is rejected. For some physics theories, merely getting the mathematics to artwork is a considerable try. If the equations say that a proton could have mass different than that of a proton, it failed that first mandatory try.
2016-10-16 10:57:58 · answer #2 · answered by jackson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
11 dimensional string theory has not produced anything, and is possibly evidence of paranoid sabotage of science by the 21 organizations spying on the population at the same time, with plain clothes agents.
It is possible that the 7 dimensions of space that are not perceived are mathematical deception, and therefore string theory is a theory of nothing, as you will find if you read the wikipedia article on string theory all the way to the end.
2007-02-02 03:53:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
problematic task. seek with bing and yahoo. this may help!
2014-12-10 20:24:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋