not to me, infact, unless they know something unique, I wish they would shut up about politics, no they are not going to sway me either way and the fact that they think they can is just a further bit of proof at how very self absorbed they truely are...
2007-02-01 22:51:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
on the full, i do no longer think of that united statesa.'s anger over contemporary political developments is unavoidably fairly as quiet because of the fact the item exhibits. although, the item is actual appropriate that a huge share of people, whilst no longer unavoidably going public approximately it, are angered via the present developments. i'm no longer as vocal as some are approximately it, yet i might desire to upload that for the period of so announcing that I communicate fullyyt for myself, no longer different self-pointed out conservatives. although, I even have been a great deal aggravated via the certainty that the government looks to have sent the point of government spending to absolutely stratospheric ranges, with out regard to what cost would be paid via successive generations of people. that is not any longer sufficient, it form of feels, to have present entitlements nicely on the line to financial disaster. As those days as final month, yet yet another entitlement application has been extra contained in this variety of an interminably long wellness care bill that could in practice entail a considerable bounce contained in direction of entire government administration of the yankee scientific sector - a flow that this u . s . a . will, i'm confident, long lament, if the constitutional stressful circumstances to the bill do no longer postpone. precisely how this might play out interior the elections this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days remains to be seen (i think of that it would be unwise on my area to invest on 2012 and later years). whilst I do have self belief that the Democrats will pay heavily for the present administration's radical regulations, i might strongly propose the Republican occasion to no longer get too cocky approximately its possibilities, as a type of conservatives have suggested the possibility of a 0.33 occasion - an theory which in practice might have the consequences of dividing the contest, making it far much less effectual than it in any different case may well be.
2016-11-02 03:02:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes as 1) there is a part of the population who live their life according to the bible of celeb and 2) They reach more people than the average nobody. Its bloody hateful.
2007-02-01 22:46:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by tickTickTICK 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
No way - Most celebs don't have a clue - The media seems to be under the impression that everyone is interested in their lives, what they do and what they think (or what their PR guy thinks), when really we only read/watch it coz there's nothing else on.....
2007-02-01 22:45:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It matters less.
Most celebrities are self-publicist attention-seekers who don't live in the real word. Being rich and famous puts of them out of touch with reality..
2007-02-01 22:43:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mad Professor 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Only if the celebrity is answering a question on their particular field of expertise (not sure what that would be for Jade).. Otherwise, not at all!
2007-02-01 22:44:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by FC 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Their opinion isn't any more valid than a regual person's, but because their opinion can be heard by more people, it can have more of a consequence and in that respect what they have to say does matter more.
2007-02-01 22:48:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jenny 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, However they have a role to play, and therefore, especially if they are children's presenter must be careful about what they say, as they're opinions can be extemely influential.
2007-02-02 04:03:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No definitely not, unless it is a credible 'celebrity' who actually knows a lot about what they are talking about, which is rarely the case.
2007-02-01 22:41:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No i don't think it does!! If its a celeb someone really looks up to then it may matter.
2007-02-01 22:47:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vamp82 3
·
2⤊
0⤋