2007-02-01 21:27:00 · 8 answers · asked by Barbara Doll to you 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
'Should' and 'Will' are two different words and they are poles apart. He will wriggle off the hook once again and bring his party into further disrepute.
2007-02-01 21:43:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he should. Peerages are given on recommendation of the PM. Though they are officially given by the queen, how does the queen choose who gets a peerage? PM's recommendation of course. Enough said really.
2007-02-01 23:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by Master Mevans 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't make a lot of difference whether or not Blair is guilty or not. If anything is proven about his closest aides he, as PM, must take the rap and resign. If it's proved that he was involved then anything could happen.
2007-02-02 02:15:52 · answer #3 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course.thats why the police are investigating.
naturally, they are just going through the motions ,and tony blairs,loony left friend Sir ian blair will have already guaranteed there will be no evidence.
Enough time wasted on corrupt governments ,there are innocent motorists out there!
2007-02-01 21:32:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He should be the most accountable. but you could always fall back on John Prescott! even though he wouldn't know what you were talking about
2007-02-01 21:41:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Course he should be accountable. All elected MPs should be accountable to the public(us).
2007-02-01 21:35:39 · answer #6 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he should, he knew exactly what was going on.
2007-02-01 21:36:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-02-01 21:33:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋