Should Liberals be thrown into the ocean?

Question

yes, they should

Answer 1

Sure they should have started years ago with Galileo finding the consonants, so Reagan would not have been able to promote a satellite defense program to bring Russia to its knees, or Jefferson advocating the separation of Church and State afraid that the likes of atheist Carl Rove would bring corruption into the Churches with politics, or Lincoln who liberated those brown folks, so a combination of scientist with a so called Chandrasekhar V. Raman, who came up with the Raman effect would be able to device the atomic bomb which made the USA the great global power it is now. Sure throw the liberal in the sea and with them America as you know it.

Answer 2

Ah, now i see. The sea is salty because of all the sweaty liberals that have been thrown into it. Just as i am penniless because republicans are a class of human, who require the money of the poor in which to survive.

Answer 3

are we to deduce from this submit that you're chuffed? i ask because maximum chuffed people do not decide on to run round yelling about it. and maximum psychologically healthful people do not use that as a trump card over others both. i ought to anticipate you to envision this textual content and snort to your self, extremely joyful at having your opinion shown. end of tale. I have a diverse idea about people. many (yet via no skill all) are insecure and that is almost not available for them to have a concept and take delight in that. no, except they could impose that concept on others and demand that any one which disagrees with them is faulty, they're unhappy. ever word the consistent complaining from conservatives in this web site about the responses (and violations) they get for questions revealed about hillary and obama? the offended and annoyed tone? the questions and the proceedings strike me because the fabricated from very un-chuffed individuals. and "rationalization" is a unfavorable time period in psychiatric circles. that is often used to describe the non-linear questioning people interact in to excuse their abhorrent habit. in reality, quite a number of conservative bloggers have attacked the study for that reason. weird and wonderful that not one of the conservatives in this web site who've considered this textual content and revealed editions of this question have talked about that element of it. yet what do i understand? i'm purely yet another grumpy, depressed liberal. per chance i ought to offer up crying and grow to be a registered republican? nah! i'd not decide on to unexpectedly have my iq drop as precipitously as conservatism looks to require.

Answer 4

Your statement is a shining example of why the republicans lost the last election and will probably lose the next presidential election. Your capacity for intolerance is amazing. Why anyone would associate themselves with that kind of thinking never ceases to amaze me.

Answer 5

If you want to live in a one manner of government country, go live in Iraq but in countries which strive to serve all their residents, liberals are needed, as are conservitives.

Answer 6

~I know you are a neo con because you first asked a question, then answered it yourself.
Throw yourself in the ocean.~

Answer 7

Only if they are tied to a member of the religous right.

Answer 8

Wouldn't that adversely affect the content and taste of seafood?

Answer 9

Abandon your animosities and make your sons Americans.

Answer 10

I am sure that a great number of them can swim so no. Keep trying though.